[StanUSwagU]

I'm not saying it needs to be either/or. Literally all I'm suggesting is that perhaps we could improve the impact of the 40 year argument by refining it. That's all.

*************

Hi Mick,

1. Hope all is well.

2. I have read your posts before, well enough to know you weren't 'suggesting an either or paradigm'; :o)

3. I too agree, our Stanford Administration & Athletics Department , needs to drastically 'polish up' its 'sales pitches' to 'Smart 4star athletes':

--Sales pitches & concrete data on the '40year decision front' !
--As well as Sales pitches & concrete competitive offers on the NIL front
--Backed-up by Examples & Actions (not talk) Selling & 'letting these 'Smart 4star athletes' know we will not be outdone by NotreDame or Duke on ANY FRONT (eg Coaching, Facilities, Marketing, NIL) and we may just exceed what NotreDame & Duke & Cal, & UCLA will offer you' in terms of our Commitment to Football & Mens Basketball !

[StanUSwagU]

I'm not saying it needs to be either/or. Literally all I'm suggesting is that perhaps we could improve the impact of the 40 year argument by refining it. That's all.

*************

Hi Mick,

1. Hope all is well.

2. I have read your posts before, well enough to know you weren't 'suggesting an either or paradigm'; :o)

3. I too agree, our Stanford Administration & Athletics Department , needs to drastically 'polish up' its 'sales pitches' to 'Smart 4star athletes':

--Sales pitches & concrete data on the '40year decision front' !
--As well as Sales pitches & concrete competitive offers on the NIL front
--Backed-up by Examples & Actions (not talk) Selling & 'letting these 'Smart 4star athletes' know we will not be outdone by NotreDame or Duke on ANY FRONT (eg Coaching, Facilities, Marketing, NIL) and we may just exceed what NotreDame & Duke & Cal, & UCLA will offer you' in terms of our Commitment to Football & Mens Basketball !