[M T]

AcesUp, did you get to the end of the article to see who (presumably) wrote the “puff piece”. 

It sounded to me more like an article about what it takes to be among the best.  I think the article would be relevant 20 or even 50 years in the future or past 


Before people find a tall tree, let’s see what the investigations reveal or not find. 

Is Stanford, and other schools, finding that some athletes that were big fish in high school believe they are entitled to be big fish in Division I or else it is the school/coach’s fault?  The two authors give a different viewpoint than I had heard before, and it rings true. But one can always view evolution from the viewpoint of the surviving species or the extinct species.

[M T]

AcesUp, did you get to the end of the article to see who (presumably) wrote the “puff piece”. 

It sounded to me more like an article about what it takes to be among the best.  I think the article would be relevant 20 or even 50 years in the future or past 


Before people find a tall tree, let’s see what the investigations reveal or not find. 

Is Stanford, and other schools, finding that some athletes that were big fish in high school believe they are entitled to be big fish in Division I or else it is the school/coach’s fault?  The two authors give a different viewpoint than I had heard before, and it rings true. But one can always view evolution from the viewpoint of the surviving species or the extinct species.