[Mudhead]

1748652139[/url]']

1748651756[/url]']

1748649637[/url]']
It depends.  What is the “value” of a CWS appearance and a chance to a national title in softball.  I doubt that the softball team is making more than $1 MM in increased revenue compared to the alternative, so strictly speaking, it was probably a negative financial return compared to the alternative where the benefactor just gives the AD the $1 million.

BC

Value to whom?   (Am I wrong when I believe the $1M did not come from Texas Tech University or any department of that organization?)
  The ego-based donor that pays real dollars for play-NIL that wants to see a team do well?   
   A company selling gloves & softballs that pays for actual NIL.
  The person(s) or company whose name is on the school's field or other associated equipment?
  The person who would have otherwise left the money to care for their pet?

The Matador Club, Texas Tech's NIL collective, made a historic play for Canady, offering a one-year, $1,050,024 contract (a million for Canady, $50k for living expenses, $24 for her jersey number).
...
Glasco, who didn't have much in the way of NIL in Lafayette, had suddenly walked into what he believed was the best softball situation in America. Two of the Matador Club's biggest boosters -- Tracy Sellers, a former Tech softball player, and her husband, John, an oil and gas executive and former Red Raiders football player under Mike Leach -- had been supporting softball for years. They donated $11 million to the athletic department in 2022, with $1 million designated for softball stadium upgrades.
...
Looking back at the Sellers' donation for the softball facilities, the same size investment in Canady had a greater transformative impact.

https://www.espn.com/college-sports/soft...dy-pitcher

At last. I think we are beginning to get it. The era of the “40year decision” is over.  It’s not about whether a million dollars is a good advertising investment. It’s not about the revenue an NIL payment brings to a school. It’s not even about who has the most money ; I doubt there is any set of alumns more wealthy than Stanford’s set.  It’s about winning. Whether we like it or. It, it appears those folks down in Lubbock want to win more than we do .

That doesn’t make it right and it doesn’t make it wrong . And I am not at all sure it is stable . But right now if you want a winning college athletic program , the sina qua non ( forgive the abuse of Latin) is will to win at whatever price.

Whatever decisions “we” make has to recognize that reality.

[Mudhead]

1748652139[/url]']

1748651756[/url]']

1748649637[/url]']
It depends.  What is the “value” of a CWS appearance and a chance to a national title in softball.  I doubt that the softball team is making more than $1 MM in increased revenue compared to the alternative, so strictly speaking, it was probably a negative financial return compared to the alternative where the benefactor just gives the AD the $1 million.

BC

Value to whom?   (Am I wrong when I believe the $1M did not come from Texas Tech University or any department of that organization?)
  The ego-based donor that pays real dollars for play-NIL that wants to see a team do well?   
   A company selling gloves & softballs that pays for actual NIL.
  The person(s) or company whose name is on the school's field or other associated equipment?
  The person who would have otherwise left the money to care for their pet?

The Matador Club, Texas Tech's NIL collective, made a historic play for Canady, offering a one-year, $1,050,024 contract (a million for Canady, $50k for living expenses, $24 for her jersey number).
...
Glasco, who didn't have much in the way of NIL in Lafayette, had suddenly walked into what he believed was the best softball situation in America. Two of the Matador Club's biggest boosters -- Tracy Sellers, a former Tech softball player, and her husband, John, an oil and gas executive and former Red Raiders football player under Mike Leach -- had been supporting softball for years. They donated $11 million to the athletic department in 2022, with $1 million designated for softball stadium upgrades.
...
Looking back at the Sellers' donation for the softball facilities, the same size investment in Canady had a greater transformative impact.

https://www.espn.com/college-sports/soft...dy-pitcher

At last. I think we are beginning to get it. The era of the “40year decision” is over.  It’s not about whether a million dollars is a good advertising investment. It’s not about the revenue an NIL payment brings to a school. It’s not even about who has the most money ; I doubt there is any set of alumns more wealthy than Stanford’s set.  It’s about winning. Whether we like it or. It, it appears those folks down in Lubbock want to win more than we do .

That doesn’t make it right and it doesn’t make it wrong . And I am not at all sure it is stable . But right now if you want a winning college athletic program , the sina qua non ( forgive the abuse of Latin) is will to win at whatever price.

Whatever decisions “we” make has to recognize that reality.