[TrumpCard]

1754060408[/url]']
Taylor is represented by Paul Salvaty of Cohen & Williams, former partner at Hogan Lovells. Hastings/Notre Dame. 
(1) Paul Salvaty | LinkedIn

And he liked the Sacto Bee's article outlining the case. Lawsuit alleges that Stanford leaked the confidential investigations to them:
(1) Post | Feed | LinkedIn

I didn't read the 54 page complaint, but he strikes me as the kind of attorney who doesn't take this on unless he has a strong case. 
Taylor v. ESPN Inc. et al (5:25-cv-06384), California Northern District Court

Interesting comment. Are you a litigator and do you know Salvaty directly? Do you have a gut as to whether the case is hourly or contingency? Do you have thoughts on the choice of federal court as the venue and whether that relates to the merits?  Or thoughts on what inside info Salvaty or Taylor might have about the leak or about ESPN’s vetting? Anything else strike you as being a key sign relating to the merits? I often find this sort of exercise like reading tea leaves, but I haven’t really considered the specifics of this case.

[TrumpCard]

1754060408[/url]']
Taylor is represented by Paul Salvaty of Cohen & Williams, former partner at Hogan Lovells. Hastings/Notre Dame. 
(1) Paul Salvaty | LinkedIn

And he liked the Sacto Bee's article outlining the case. Lawsuit alleges that Stanford leaked the confidential investigations to them:
(1) Post | Feed | LinkedIn

I didn't read the 54 page complaint, but he strikes me as the kind of attorney who doesn't take this on unless he has a strong case. 
Taylor v. ESPN Inc. et al (5:25-cv-06384), California Northern District Court

Interesting comment. Are you a litigator and do you know Salvaty directly? Do you have a gut as to whether the case is hourly or contingency? Do you have thoughts on the choice of federal court as the venue and whether that relates to the merits?  Or thoughts on what inside info Salvaty or Taylor might have about the leak or about ESPN’s vetting? Anything else strike you as being a key sign relating to the merits? I often find this sort of exercise like reading tea leaves, but I haven’t really considered the specifics of this case.