(10-11-2025, 07:00 PM)BostonCard Wrote: If we had scored 14 points for the two times we had first and goal, instead of allowing a pick-six, SMU would have still won, but it would have wound up something like 27-24, which is a bit more reflective of the relative yards for each team. I’m not saying that we screwed the pooch here and should have won; SMU was clearly the better team. But the score could have been much closer than it was.
BC
Yeah... a 95-yard pick-SIX doesn't show up on either team's Yardage gained. Add that to SMU.
So, next week will be a track meet: FLST averages 560 yds a game, and 47 points -- Average. Balanced attack.
Then the following week, we travel to MIAM to play the BEST DEFENSE in the ACC, allowing just 13 points a game.
The WORST three Offenses in the ACC are KalSucks, then Stanford, then NCAR BeliSucks.
After the road trip to Hard Rock, FL then we get 3 of 4 at home to finish on Nov. 29 (Domers) and study for finals.
At Big Game, KalSucks could come in at 6-4, if they beat both NCAR and VTEC (likely), losing to VIRG and @LOUV.
Last two years they finished 6-6 before bowls. Last two years, Bears went bowling; we didn't.
Last time we won Big Game -- 2020 on a late blocked PAT. Bears own the axe. Taking it this year is our bowl game.
December = Find a coach, start working the Portal for O-Line with fresh Brad Freeman NIL money.
Beat NCAR, PITT and KAL, putting us at 5-7, which shows momentum as Harbaugh did in 2008.
2009 was then our turnaround year with Luck, Gerhart, and an O-Line. Crushed Troy in the Coliseum. Finished 8-5.
