[76lsjumb]

This is going to be impossible to keep politics free, but it is off to an inauspicious start.  It is also an important topic of clear relevance to a Stanford sports board, so please whether you think this is the greatest administration since Lincoln's or the worst administration in history, please keep that to yourself and focus on the content of the executive order.

FWIW, I would love to see the executive order to codified by a congressional act to make it law, because I am inclined to agree that courts will probably find it unconstitutional.  But content wise, (5 year limit in college, one free transfer without penalty, support for non-revenue sports) I pretty much agree the EO is spot-on.

BC

Quick question: When a person makes a libelous post about someone, does a moderator have the authority to simply delete it, or is it allowed to simply remain there because to point out that it is ridiculous would violate the politics rule? Just asking for a friend…

[76lsjumb]

This is going to be impossible to keep politics free, but it is off to an inauspicious start.  It is also an important topic of clear relevance to a Stanford sports board, so please whether you think this is the greatest administration since Lincoln's or the worst administration in history, please keep that to yourself and focus on the content of the executive order.

FWIW, I would love to see the executive order to codified by a congressional act to make it law, because I am inclined to agree that courts will probably find it unconstitutional.  But content wise, (5 year limit in college, one free transfer without penalty, support for non-revenue sports) I pretty much agree the EO is spot-on.

BC

Quick question: When a person makes a libelous post about someone, does a moderator have the authority to simply delete it, or is it allowed to simply remain there because to point out that it is ridiculous would violate the politics rule? Just asking for a friend…