06-17-2026, 01:26 PM
https://www.yahoo.com/sports/articles/br...52690.html
Obviously not from a "neutral" source but if Cincinnati really did explicitly know this gambling was going on they do indeed have a lot to explain. It does seem bizarre to me that they would file a lawsuit to get 1 million back from Sorsby if they indeed did knowingly allow him to gamble and then play him anyway. They should have just been quiet and said "no comment" when asked anything about Sorsby if they did in fact know. It may be that the phone app is a fig leaf for plausible deniability. Obviously since the players know their phone will rat them out if they use it to gamble, they simply do it via intermediaries. The school can claim they did "all they could" when they definitely didn't.
Obviously not from a "neutral" source but if Cincinnati really did explicitly know this gambling was going on they do indeed have a lot to explain. It does seem bizarre to me that they would file a lawsuit to get 1 million back from Sorsby if they indeed did knowingly allow him to gamble and then play him anyway. They should have just been quiet and said "no comment" when asked anything about Sorsby if they did in fact know. It may be that the phone app is a fig leaf for plausible deniability. Obviously since the players know their phone will rat them out if they use it to gamble, they simply do it via intermediaries. The school can claim they did "all they could" when they definitely didn't.