[M T]

I don't think Hambly minds too much the start of the third set going awry.  Beating Marquette is not their final goal. Being ahead 2-0 gives some room for experimenting or other training. The bad start in the 3rd set gave Stanford an opportunity to see how they can perform when down.  They didn't do that great a job, but they went from 3-10 to 17-19 before letting it go.  (Btw, the first 2 points of the third set were won by Marquette by some really impressive defense.  But after that, it felt like all sorts of things went wrong on the Stanford side.)

In this match, Blayashov had 13 kills and 14 digs, hitting 0.429.  Impressive.  Of course, there were the 4 aces by Parks plus 3 others with one ace.  The kills were nicely spread around: 14, 14, 13, 13.
In the previous match, Lizzy Andrew had 17 kills and 12 blocks.

Demaria played quite well in the previous match (13K, 7B) but didn't get on the court today.

[M T]

I don't think Hambly minds too much the start of the third set going awry.  Beating Marquette is not their final goal. Being ahead 2-0 gives some room for experimenting or other training. The bad start in the 3rd set gave Stanford an opportunity to see how they can perform when down.  They didn't do that great a job, but they went from 3-10 to 17-19 before letting it go.  (Btw, the first 2 points of the third set were won by Marquette by some really impressive defense.  But after that, it felt like all sorts of things went wrong on the Stanford side.)

In this match, Blayashov had 13 kills and 14 digs, hitting 0.429.  Impressive.  Of course, there were the 4 aces by Parks plus 3 others with one ace.  The kills were nicely spread around: 14, 14, 13, 13.
In the previous match, Lizzy Andrew had 17 kills and 12 blocks.

Demaria played quite well in the previous match (13K, 7B) but didn't get on the court today.