[BigJohn043]

- serve reception has to be better. Especially Kurt who was a mess in this one, including 4 of the 7 reception errors.
- the Parks setting whiff blew the first set. The next point she was rattled and her sets were off. Then Kurt got aced. It went from 20-20 to 20-23 in a flash. Set basically over.
- Andrew and Blyashov were great. Kurt and Harvey couldn’t get much going.
- second set - just ugh.
- serving wasn’t great.

Stanford actually outpassed TAMU.

Texas A&M-Stanford
A&M 1.96 | Stowers 1.93/37% (19), Applegate 2.03/47% (17), Rodriguez 2.00/40% (15), Fitch 2.1/40% (10), Ring 1.61/33% (9)
Stanford 2.17 | Blyashov 2.2/50% (40), Roslon 2.59/70% (17), Etzler 2.14/57% (14), Kurt 1.54/33% (12)

[BigJohn043]

- serve reception has to be better. Especially Kurt who was a mess in this one, including 4 of the 7 reception errors.
- the Parks setting whiff blew the first set. The next point she was rattled and her sets were off. Then Kurt got aced. It went from 20-20 to 20-23 in a flash. Set basically over.
- Andrew and Blyashov were great. Kurt and Harvey couldn’t get much going.
- second set - just ugh.
- serving wasn’t great.

Stanford actually outpassed TAMU.

Texas A&M-Stanford
A&M 1.96 | Stowers 1.93/37% (19), Applegate 2.03/47% (17), Rodriguez 2.00/40% (15), Fitch 2.1/40% (10), Ring 1.61/33% (9)
Stanford 2.17 | Blyashov 2.2/50% (40), Roslon 2.59/70% (17), Etzler 2.14/57% (14), Kurt 1.54/33% (12)