10-17-2010, 05:23 AM
I\'m in favor of any alignment that preserves the UCLA and USC yearly games. I think the 5-2-2 is pretty silly and an unlikely longterm solution, though I would prefer it to a North division without the preserved rivalries. I honestly don\'t really care about beating any of the other potential North teams besides kal.
With 7-5 being the split in the last set of votes, and the California schools with the leverage, I\'m hopeful they can work something out, perhaps as a concession for even revenue sharing.
Also, for the foreseeable future, I don\'t see how playing UCLA or USC every year puts us at a competitive disadvantage- UCLA is not recovering under Neuheisel, and Kiffin will drive USC into the ground. USC will rise again I\'m sure. UCLA I\'m not so certain.
With 7-5 being the split in the last set of votes, and the California schools with the leverage, I\'m hopeful they can work something out, perhaps as a concession for even revenue sharing.
Also, for the foreseeable future, I don\'t see how playing UCLA or USC every year puts us at a competitive disadvantage- UCLA is not recovering under Neuheisel, and Kiffin will drive USC into the ground. USC will rise again I\'m sure. UCLA I\'m not so certain.
