[stupac2]

Equal revenue sharing is a cornstone of the PAC agreement, so joking aside, that's not going to happen (and is generally a bad idea). As funny as it would be to exclude some teams, it's a bad idea.

Also, I think the SEC demonstrates pretty conclusively that you're much better off having a few really good teams and a bunch of bad teams than you are having parity. Hopefully the playoff will nullify this somewhat, but being able to pencil in 10 wins (4 cupcake OOC, 4 crappy OC) helps immensely for getting the BCS $$$, as well as getting into other high-payout bowls.

That's one thing the PAC could definitely use, better bowl contracts. Of course, burning the whole thing down to the ground would be even better, but we're not there yet.

[stupac2]

Equal revenue sharing is a cornstone of the PAC agreement, so joking aside, that's not going to happen (and is generally a bad idea). As funny as it would be to exclude some teams, it's a bad idea.

Also, I think the SEC demonstrates pretty conclusively that you're much better off having a few really good teams and a bunch of bad teams than you are having parity. Hopefully the playoff will nullify this somewhat, but being able to pencil in 10 wins (4 cupcake OOC, 4 crappy OC) helps immensely for getting the BCS $$$, as well as getting into other high-payout bowls.

That's one thing the PAC could definitely use, better bowl contracts. Of course, burning the whole thing down to the ground would be even better, but we're not there yet.