[unclechuck]

george - I\'m in complete agreement with your rosy scenario; best outcome for us and the conference. However, I haven\'t stayed current on the latest tweaks of BCS game selection, especially the selection process for the at large teams. So, I\'ve been managing my hopes with a best case scenario of an Alamo match up with a one loss Big12 team.

Are you sure about a prospective #4 ranking insuring selection? My impression is that aside from this one year non-AQ rider for the Rose Bowl and the moot ND requirements the BCS bowl committees have a pretty free hand in selecting their at-large teams with travel attendance being the major determinant. Does ranking or number of losses confer specific selection status?

Can you clarify?

[unclechuck]

george - I\'m in complete agreement with your rosy scenario; best outcome for us and the conference. However, I haven\'t stayed current on the latest tweaks of BCS game selection, especially the selection process for the at large teams. So, I\'ve been managing my hopes with a best case scenario of an Alamo match up with a one loss Big12 team.

Are you sure about a prospective #4 ranking insuring selection? My impression is that aside from this one year non-AQ rider for the Rose Bowl and the moot ND requirements the BCS bowl committees have a pretty free hand in selecting their at-large teams with travel attendance being the major determinant. Does ranking or number of losses confer specific selection status?

Can you clarify?