[terry]

So other teams are achieving 30 points with two or three  15-point recruits.   We are up there with them but with seven women,  some of whom are "worth" 3 pts.     That doesn\'t seem like a top recruiting class,  it is leveraged by numbers, a artifact of an uneven recruiting cycle, yes?   Seems an odd way to claim a "top" class.  

These rankings don\'t really give Stanford much of a boost due to the size of the class. Counting everyone in the class, Stanford is tied for 4th. If we were to eliminate the three lowest-rated recruits and evaluate Stanford based only on its top three recruits, Stanford would be 5th. Those last three recruits make little difference in these rankings as they currently stand.

[terry]

So other teams are achieving 30 points with two or three  15-point recruits.   We are up there with them but with seven women,  some of whom are "worth" 3 pts.     That doesn\'t seem like a top recruiting class,  it is leveraged by numbers, a artifact of an uneven recruiting cycle, yes?   Seems an odd way to claim a "top" class.  

These rankings don\'t really give Stanford much of a boost due to the size of the class. Counting everyone in the class, Stanford is tied for 4th. If we were to eliminate the three lowest-rated recruits and evaluate Stanford based only on its top three recruits, Stanford would be 5th. Those last three recruits make little difference in these rankings as they currently stand.