09-09-2014, 04:03 PM
But with due consideration of short field etc. is it reasonable to assume that that decrease in efficiency is more the norm? I mean, it's not a problem that is unique to Stanford, I presume, but rather a matter of magnitude.
I think this is an inquiry, not a statement. Don't know what to think of those (excellent) numbers you provided BC in the absence of something to compare it to.
I think this is an inquiry, not a statement. Don't know what to think of those (excellent) numbers you provided BC in the absence of something to compare it to.
"It's not what you don't know that gets you in trouble. It's what you think you know that just isn't so."
Mark Twain