• Portal
  • Forum
  • Search
  • Member
  • Misc
    • View New Posts
    • View Today's Posts
    • View Forum Rules
    • Help Docs
Login or Register Hello There, Guest! Please Login or Register to gain Full Access!
Login
Username/Email:
Password: Lost Password?
 

  1. The CardBoard
  2. C-House!
  3. The CARDboard
  4. Outside Topic Theranos' Elizabeth Holmes indicted
Pages (3): « Previous 1 2 3
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Thread Modes
Outside Topic Theranos' Elizabeth Holmes indicted
gailtate
Dolly
**
Posts: 259
Threads: 33
Joined: Dec 2018
Reputation: 11
#41
09-14-2020, 09:04 AM
(09-13-2020, 05:24 PM)teejers1 Wrote:  
(09-13-2020, 01:55 PM)gailtate Wrote:  
(06-18-2018, 08:05 PM)chrisk Wrote:  She got support from Stanford stalwarts George Schultz and Channing Robertson.

George Schultz, for all his street smarts, business eminence and personal distinction, revealed stunningly poor judgement here. You can't make this up. Not only taking the Theranos bait hook, line, and sinker, but doubling down on his bets with a public legal feud with his son who was desperately trying to extricate the old man from this cluster.

grandson, wasn't it?

'Twas.
Find
Reply
82lsju
I may be small, but I'm slow too
*****
Posts: 3,404
Threads: 466
Joined: Dec 1969
Reputation: 39
#42
04-11-2021, 08:52 AM
Quote:Stanford University law school professor Robert Weisberg believes Holmes has two potential avenues for a mental-condition defense: claiming her judgment was affected or that she acted under duress. If the former, her argument “will be laid out in terms of something like her mental distress clouded her judgment so she didn’t truly form the intent to commit the crimes” perhaps because of an “overwrought or emotional state” that meant she didn’t think through the possibility that others could be harmed, Weisberg said. “You have to somehow connect the dots that the state of emotional distress … made it psychologically impossible to form the intent,” he said.

If Mechanic is to testify that Holmes acted under duress, Weisberg and other legal experts said the psychologist may focus on Holmes’ relationship with Balwani. “There may be some kind of effort at a ‘Svengali defense,'” Weisberg said, referring to a legal tactic named for a seductive, domineering character from a 19th century novel. “It would have to be in support of the claim that she was facing an immediate and extremely specific threat that harm would come to her if she didn’t do the criminal acts.”



https://www.mercurynews.com/2021/04/11/d...=Geotagged

Eric

"the older we get the better we were"
Find
Reply
paloalto
Dolly
**
Posts: 455
Threads: 1
Joined: May 2020
Reputation: 5
#43
04-11-2021, 08:59 AM
(This post was last modified: 04-11-2021, 09:00 AM by paloalto.)
Holmes better hope I'm not on her jury if she goes with the first proposed approach.  I'd listen to the arguments, listen to the forensics psychiatrists, and follow the court instructions.   However, it would be a uphill battle to convince me that over a decade an intelligent person couldn't reflect on the concept her product and all her bogus test results weren't doing harm.

I understand when the facts aren't in your favor you have to try something.
Find
Reply
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »

Pages (3): « Previous 1 2 3


  • View a Printable Version
  • Subscribe to this thread
Forum Jump:

About Our Community

Welcome to The CardBoard. We are THE community for Stanford sports fans and guests. We include alumni, former athletes, students, and just plain Cardinal crazies, as well as guest fans of Cardinal opponents.

Quick Links



Reach Us

Contact Us  Meet Our team

Powered By MyBB. Crafted by EreeCorp.
Linear Mode
Threaded Mode