09-30-2016, 11:11 PM
Forget the corners the most glaring thing was that the starters, 32 and 34 made no plays. Time and again they got turned in and blocked out. Speed kills. This looked like a Don James team.
The OLB's
09-30-2016, 11:11 PM
Forget the corners the most glaring thing was that the starters, 32 and 34 made no plays. Time and again they got turned in and blocked out. Speed kills. This looked like a Don James team.
10-01-2016, 05:38 AM
It looked to my eye that Mike Tyler was the best at outside contain on his side. One of the adjustments they should have made on defense was lining the OLBs up a bit wider. They were lined up right over the OT or TE all night, and routinely got turned inside. This also prevented them from ever being able to use their supposed speed advantage by going wide.
It looked to my eye that Mike Tyler was the best at outside contain on his side. One of the adjustments they should have made on defense was lining the OLBs up a bit wider. They were lined up right over the OT or TE all night, and routinely got turned inside. This also prevented them from ever being able to use their supposed speed advantage by going wide.
10-01-2016, 05:38 AM
It looked to my eye that Mike Tyler was the best at outside contain on his side. One of the adjustments they should have made on defense was lining the OLBs up a bit wider. They were lined up right over the OT or TE all night, and routinely got turned inside. This also prevented them from ever being able to use their supposed speed advantage by going wide.
It looked to my eye that Mike Tyler was the best at outside contain on his side. One of the adjustments they should have made on defense was lining the OLBs up a bit wider. They were lined up right over the OT or TE all night, and routinely got turned inside. This also prevented them from ever being able to use their supposed speed advantage by going wide.
The pass rush has been not so great this season. Big surprise for me.
The pass rush has been not so great this season. Big surprise for me.
10-01-2016, 07:32 AM
(10-01-2016, 07:06 AM)washingtonismoney link Wrote:The pass rush has been not so great this season. Big surprise for me.
It was great against KSU!
10-01-2016, 07:32 AM
(10-01-2016, 07:06 AM)washingtonismoney link Wrote:The pass rush has been not so great this season. Big surprise for me.
It was great against KSU!
10-01-2016, 07:43 AM
(10-01-2016, 07:32 AM)stupac2 link Wrote:[quote author=washingtonismoney link=topic=15833.msg174417#msg174417 date=1475330783]
The pass rush has been not so great this season. Big surprise for me.
It was great against KSU!
[/quote]
Yeah, I think those were mostly coverage sacks.
(10-01-2016, 07:32 AM)stupac2 link Wrote:[quote author=washingtonismoney link=topic=15833.msg174417#msg174417 date=1475330783]
The pass rush has been not so great this season. Big surprise for me.
It was great against KSU!
[/quote]
Yeah, I think those were mostly coverage sacks.
10-01-2016, 07:43 AM
(10-01-2016, 07:32 AM)stupac2 link Wrote:[quote author=washingtonismoney link=topic=15833.msg174417#msg174417 date=1475330783]
The pass rush has been not so great this season. Big surprise for me.
It was great against KSU!
[/quote]
Yeah, I think those were mostly coverage sacks.
(10-01-2016, 07:32 AM)stupac2 link Wrote:[quote author=washingtonismoney link=topic=15833.msg174417#msg174417 date=1475330783]
The pass rush has been not so great this season. Big surprise for me.
It was great against KSU!
[/quote]
Yeah, I think those were mostly coverage sacks.
10-01-2016, 08:37 AM
UW's sacks were NOT coverage sacks. Almost all of them happened within 3-3.5 secs of the snap. They were the result of horrible blocking, especially by A.T. Hall at LT. Shawgren's experiment should be over now - it never should have been done in the first place. Put Tucker back at LT and Hall back at RT ASAP.
UW's sacks were NOT coverage sacks. Almost all of them happened within 3-3.5 secs of the snap. They were the result of horrible blocking, especially by A.T. Hall at LT. Shawgren's experiment should be over now - it never should have been done in the first place. Put Tucker back at LT and Hall back at RT ASAP.
10-01-2016, 08:37 AM
UW's sacks were NOT coverage sacks. Almost all of them happened within 3-3.5 secs of the snap. They were the result of horrible blocking, especially by A.T. Hall at LT. Shawgren's experiment should be over now - it never should have been done in the first place. Put Tucker back at LT and Hall back at RT ASAP.
UW's sacks were NOT coverage sacks. Almost all of them happened within 3-3.5 secs of the snap. They were the result of horrible blocking, especially by A.T. Hall at LT. Shawgren's experiment should be over now - it never should have been done in the first place. Put Tucker back at LT and Hall back at RT ASAP.
ChicagoCard
Unregistered
Unregistered
10-01-2016, 08:39 AM
(10-01-2016, 08:37 AM)winflop link Wrote:UW's sacks were NOT coverage sacks. Almost all of them happened within 3-3.5 secs of the snap. They were the result of horrible blocking, especially by A.T. Hall at LT. Shawgren's experiment should be over now - it never should have been done in the first place. Put Tucker back at LT and Hall back at RT ASAP.
Well, that might have to wait a while. I'll bet what happens is Bright goes to a tackle and Fanaika to left guard, that's if Tucker is out for a while, or until next year even.
(10-01-2016, 08:37 AM)winflop link Wrote:UW's sacks were NOT coverage sacks. Almost all of them happened within 3-3.5 secs of the snap. They were the result of horrible blocking, especially by A.T. Hall at LT. Shawgren's experiment should be over now - it never should have been done in the first place. Put Tucker back at LT and Hall back at RT ASAP.
Well, that might have to wait a while. I'll bet what happens is Bright goes to a tackle and Fanaika to left guard, that's if Tucker is out for a while, or until next year even.
ChicagoCard
Unregistered
Unregistered
10-01-2016, 08:39 AM
(10-01-2016, 08:37 AM)winflop link Wrote:UW's sacks were NOT coverage sacks. Almost all of them happened within 3-3.5 secs of the snap. They were the result of horrible blocking, especially by A.T. Hall at LT. Shawgren's experiment should be over now - it never should have been done in the first place. Put Tucker back at LT and Hall back at RT ASAP.
Well, that might have to wait a while. I'll bet what happens is Bright goes to a tackle and Fanaika to left guard, that's if Tucker is out for a while, or until next year even.
(10-01-2016, 08:37 AM)winflop link Wrote:UW's sacks were NOT coverage sacks. Almost all of them happened within 3-3.5 secs of the snap. They were the result of horrible blocking, especially by A.T. Hall at LT. Shawgren's experiment should be over now - it never should have been done in the first place. Put Tucker back at LT and Hall back at RT ASAP.
Well, that might have to wait a while. I'll bet what happens is Bright goes to a tackle and Fanaika to left guard, that's if Tucker is out for a while, or until next year even.
10-01-2016, 08:50 AM
(10-01-2016, 08:37 AM)winflop link Wrote:UW's sacks were NOT coverage sacks. Almost all of them happened within 3-3.5 secs of the snap. They were the result of horrible blocking, especially by A.T. Hall at LT. Shawgren's experiment should be over now - it never should have been done in the first place. Put Tucker back at LT and Hall back at RT ASAP.
Tucker would have been worse at LT.
(10-01-2016, 08:37 AM)winflop link Wrote:UW's sacks were NOT coverage sacks. Almost all of them happened within 3-3.5 secs of the snap. They were the result of horrible blocking, especially by A.T. Hall at LT. Shawgren's experiment should be over now - it never should have been done in the first place. Put Tucker back at LT and Hall back at RT ASAP.
Tucker would have been worse at LT.
10-01-2016, 08:50 AM
(10-01-2016, 08:37 AM)winflop link Wrote:UW's sacks were NOT coverage sacks. Almost all of them happened within 3-3.5 secs of the snap. They were the result of horrible blocking, especially by A.T. Hall at LT. Shawgren's experiment should be over now - it never should have been done in the first place. Put Tucker back at LT and Hall back at RT ASAP.
Tucker would have been worse at LT.
(10-01-2016, 08:37 AM)winflop link Wrote:UW's sacks were NOT coverage sacks. Almost all of them happened within 3-3.5 secs of the snap. They were the result of horrible blocking, especially by A.T. Hall at LT. Shawgren's experiment should be over now - it never should have been done in the first place. Put Tucker back at LT and Hall back at RT ASAP.
Tucker would have been worse at LT.
10-01-2016, 09:21 AM
(10-01-2016, 08:37 AM)winflop link Wrote:UW's sacks were NOT coverage sacks. Almost all of them happened within 3-3.5 secs of the snap. They were the result of horrible blocking, especially by A.T. Hall at LT. Shawgren's experiment should be over now - it never should have been done in the first place. Put Tucker back at LT and Hall back at RT ASAP.
winflop, we were talking about K-State.
(10-01-2016, 08:37 AM)winflop link Wrote:UW's sacks were NOT coverage sacks. Almost all of them happened within 3-3.5 secs of the snap. They were the result of horrible blocking, especially by A.T. Hall at LT. Shawgren's experiment should be over now - it never should have been done in the first place. Put Tucker back at LT and Hall back at RT ASAP.
winflop, we were talking about K-State.
10-01-2016, 09:21 AM
(10-01-2016, 08:37 AM)winflop link Wrote:UW's sacks were NOT coverage sacks. Almost all of them happened within 3-3.5 secs of the snap. They were the result of horrible blocking, especially by A.T. Hall at LT. Shawgren's experiment should be over now - it never should have been done in the first place. Put Tucker back at LT and Hall back at RT ASAP.
winflop, we were talking about K-State.
(10-01-2016, 08:37 AM)winflop link Wrote:UW's sacks were NOT coverage sacks. Almost all of them happened within 3-3.5 secs of the snap. They were the result of horrible blocking, especially by A.T. Hall at LT. Shawgren's experiment should be over now - it never should have been done in the first place. Put Tucker back at LT and Hall back at RT ASAP.
winflop, we were talking about K-State.
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »