Posts: 3,788
Threads: 245
Joined: Dec 1969
I'm not denying that 'SC has the potential to be a great program and that it has the most historical success, but as many have pointed out, their national performance hasn't been exceptional for a while and in living memory, it was only a relative few years with PC at the helm that they were a dominant performer. They're not the team that the national pundits point to as an example of how to "do it right" on the west coast and they haven't won a conference championship in years. They are not a "rock" on which a conference can rely for regular elite performance like 'Bama, ND, Ohio State, Texas, etc.
Wilner and other confuse most valuable brand with flagship program. Right now, all 'SC has is "potential".