(05-27-2018, 06:14 PM)Spiny_Norman Wrote: Stanford actually finished at +20, 2 shots below the cut line according the final round 3 numbers. There may have been a late scoring correction.
There must have been. They were at +19 when I posted, but they hadn't been off the course for long.
(05-27-2018, 06:14 PM)Spiny_Norman Wrote: It was a season of "almost" for the Cardinal. They finished the NCAAs tied for 16th which is about where they were ranked coming into the tournament.
Indeed, and they did seemed to have performed better than they have at the NCAAs the past few years. We just didn't have either:
(a) several reliable low scores every day (we had a total of only
four below-par scores over all three days: a -3 and -1 on day one, a -3 on day two, and a -3 on day three); or
(b) no more than one bad round each day: each day we had to count one or more relatively high scores (+4s from Huang & Snyder on day one after Swegle was +5; +4s from Snyder & Swegle on day two after Wu went +10, and a +7 from Huang after Snyder went +9 on day three).
Sigh. It does make you appreciate what our women have accomplished, year after year.