to the tune of $530 million. Lost revenue is $800 million, insurance is for $270 million. Until 2015 they had kept $500 million in savings to make up the remainder as self-insurance, but then decided to spend it because, well, no one had anticipated a pandemic. Seems like they were unclear about the concept of insurance. Wash Post article (paywall) As a result, the NCAA has to reduce its payout to conferences and schools this year from $600M to $225M. (I didn't put this as an Outside Topic because the reduced payout will presumably affect Stanford sports)
NCAA underinsured for March Madness cancellation
to the tune of $530 million. Lost revenue is $800 million, insurance is for $270 million. Until 2015 they had kept $500 million in savings to make up the remainder as self-insurance, but then decided to spend it because, well, no one had anticipated a pandemic. Seems like they were unclear about the concept of insurance. Wash Post article (paywall) As a result, the NCAA has to reduce its payout to conferences and schools this year from $600M to $225M. (I didn't put this as an Outside Topic because the reduced payout will presumably affect Stanford sports)
04-21-2020, 11:51 AM
(04-21-2020, 10:17 AM)oldalum Wrote: to the tune of $530 million. Lost revenue is $800 million, insurance is for $270 million. Until 2015 they had kept $500 million in savings to make up the remainder as self-insurance, but then decided to spend it because, well, no one had anticipated a pandemic. Seems like they were unclear about the concept of insurance. Wash Post article (paywall) As a result, the NCAA has to reduce its payout to conferences and schools this year from $600M to $225M. (I didn't put this as an Outside Topic because the reduced payout will presumably affect Stanford sports)
Mmm. I love the smell of lawsuits in the morning...
Audaces fortuna iuvat
(04-21-2020, 10:17 AM)oldalum Wrote: to the tune of $530 million. Lost revenue is $800 million, insurance is for $270 million. Until 2015 they had kept $500 million in savings to make up the remainder as self-insurance, but then decided to spend it because, well, no one had anticipated a pandemic. Seems like they were unclear about the concept of insurance. Wash Post article (paywall) As a result, the NCAA has to reduce its payout to conferences and schools this year from $600M to $225M. (I didn't put this as an Outside Topic because the reduced payout will presumably affect Stanford sports)
Mmm. I love the smell of lawsuits in the morning...
Audaces fortuna iuvat
04-21-2020, 02:14 PM
Wimbeldon, on the other hand, actually held pandemic insurance.
https://www.sbnation.com/tennis/2020/4/8...41-million
They've been paying for 20 years.
BC
https://www.sbnation.com/tennis/2020/4/8...41-million
They've been paying for 20 years.
BC
Wimbeldon, on the other hand, actually held pandemic insurance.
https://www.sbnation.com/tennis/2020/4/8...41-million
They've been paying for 20 years.
BC
https://www.sbnation.com/tennis/2020/4/8...41-million
They've been paying for 20 years.
BC
04-22-2020, 05:29 AM
Well at least they weren't as dumb as the US Olympic Committee, who decided not to buy any insurance for the 2020 games - for the first time
04-22-2020, 09:24 AM
(04-22-2020, 05:29 AM)winflop Wrote: Well at least they weren't as dumb as the US Olympic Committee, who decided not to buy any insurance for the 2020 games - for the first timeOf course they didn't: why keep paying all this money out and never getting any back. They decided they weren't going to be played for suckers any longer.
(here's a thought: could it be more expensive because the professionals who know a lot about these risks have concluded the risk/expense of loss has increased?)
(04-22-2020, 05:29 AM)winflop Wrote: Well at least they weren't as dumb as the US Olympic Committee, who decided not to buy any insurance for the 2020 games - for the first timeOf course they didn't: why keep paying all this money out and never getting any back. They decided they weren't going to be played for suckers any longer.
(here's a thought: could it be more expensive because the professionals who know a lot about these risks have concluded the risk/expense of loss has increased?)
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
