(08-19-2023, 09:28 AM)TreesAndBirds Wrote: SJ Merc recommends ending high school football.
The highlights:
Participation in high school football in CA increased last year, first time in a decade.
New BU study finds that participation in organized football results in 61% increased likelihood of Parkinsons or similar symptoms.
CA is only state that doesnt mandate athletic trainers.
Recommends that football in high school go the way of boxing and be phased out.
https://www.mercurynews.com/2023/08/16/e...ent=manual
I don't see how an athletic trainer will help with head injuries, but it is kind of hard to believe any sports program wouldn't have an athletic trainer available, legally mandated or not.
As for football being banned, the only reason boxing was is because interest in it waned. If there were millions of dollars to be made from it in high schools, there would be boxing in high schools too.
I think we have lived with football long enough to know it doesn't cause long-term problems that somehow bring down society. This isn't to say there aren't cases where people suffer, but I would argue banning certain foods from diets would be a more effective way to mitigate the long-term cost of unhealthy choices in society.
We allow smoking. We allow alcohol. We allow Bacon Double Cheeseburgers. Things like seatbelts and mandating helmets makes sense because they save lives and money on a large scale. Not that many people play football relative to the population, and the numbers of that population that create societal cost is not that significant.
There is a fine line between protecting society, individuals, and allowing a free society. Football, I would argue, teaches a lot of good lessons and provides great benefits to those who play it more often than not. One of the greatest experiences of my life was playing High School football, for so many reasons.