09-02-2023, 11:27 AM
Free Phogge!!!! And no, crimson doesn't refer to the Tide.
(09-02-2023, 11:27 AM)cardcrimson Wrote: https://www.sfgate.com/bayarea/article/b...343731.php
(09-02-2023, 11:27 AM)cardcrimson Wrote: https://www.sfgate.com/bayarea/article/b...343731.php
(09-02-2023, 12:39 PM)norcard10 Wrote:(09-02-2023, 11:27 AM)cardcrimson Wrote: https://www.sfgate.com/bayarea/article/b...343731.php
Any ranking that has Cal in top 5 for undergrad is dubious
(09-02-2023, 12:39 PM)norcard10 Wrote:(09-02-2023, 11:27 AM)cardcrimson Wrote: https://www.sfgate.com/bayarea/article/b...343731.php
Any ranking that has Cal in top 5 for undergrad is dubious
(09-02-2023, 10:22 PM)TonyLima Wrote:Guess I should remember the audience. Got some laughs on another Stanford site. No sense of humor here, I should know that. . . .(09-02-2023, 12:39 PM)norcard10 Wrote:(09-02-2023, 11:27 AM)cardcrimson Wrote: https://www.sfgate.com/bayarea/article/b...343731.php
Any ranking that has Cal in top 5 for undergrad is dubious
Nobody who’s serious about academics takes Forbes seriously. Treat this as a lame attempt at humor.
(09-02-2023, 10:22 PM)TonyLima Wrote:Guess I should remember the audience. Got some laughs on another Stanford site. No sense of humor here, I should know that. . . .(09-02-2023, 12:39 PM)norcard10 Wrote:(09-02-2023, 11:27 AM)cardcrimson Wrote: https://www.sfgate.com/bayarea/article/b...343731.php
Any ranking that has Cal in top 5 for undergrad is dubious
Nobody who’s serious about academics takes Forbes seriously. Treat this as a lame attempt at humor.
(09-02-2023, 10:22 PM)TonyLima Wrote:(09-02-2023, 12:39 PM)norcard10 Wrote:(09-02-2023, 11:27 AM)cardcrimson Wrote: https://www.sfgate.com/bayarea/article/b...343731.php
Any ranking that has Cal in top 5 for undergrad is dubious
Nobody who’s serious about academics takes Forbes seriously. Treat this as a lame attempt at humor.
(09-02-2023, 10:22 PM)TonyLima Wrote:(09-02-2023, 12:39 PM)norcard10 Wrote:(09-02-2023, 11:27 AM)cardcrimson Wrote: https://www.sfgate.com/bayarea/article/b...343731.php
Any ranking that has Cal in top 5 for undergrad is dubious
Nobody who’s serious about academics takes Forbes seriously. Treat this as a lame attempt at humor.
(09-03-2023, 08:41 AM)cardcrimson Wrote:(09-02-2023, 10:22 PM)TonyLima Wrote:Guess I should remember the audience. Got some laughs on another Stanford site. No sense of humor here, I should know that. . . .(09-02-2023, 12:39 PM)norcard10 Wrote:(09-02-2023, 11:27 AM)cardcrimson Wrote: https://www.sfgate.com/bayarea/article/b...343731.php
Any ranking that has Cal in top 5 for undergrad is dubious
Nobody who’s serious about academics takes Forbes seriously. Treat this as a lame attempt at humor.
(09-03-2023, 08:41 AM)cardcrimson Wrote:(09-02-2023, 10:22 PM)TonyLima Wrote:Guess I should remember the audience. Got some laughs on another Stanford site. No sense of humor here, I should know that. . . .(09-02-2023, 12:39 PM)norcard10 Wrote:(09-02-2023, 11:27 AM)cardcrimson Wrote: https://www.sfgate.com/bayarea/article/b...343731.php
Any ranking that has Cal in top 5 for undergrad is dubious
Nobody who’s serious about academics takes Forbes seriously. Treat this as a lame attempt at humor.
(09-03-2023, 11:58 AM)CompSci87 Wrote:(09-03-2023, 08:41 AM)cardcrimson Wrote:(09-02-2023, 10:22 PM)TonyLima Wrote:Guess I should remember the audience. Got some laughs on another Stanford site. No sense of humor here, I should know that. . . .(09-02-2023, 12:39 PM)norcard10 Wrote:(09-02-2023, 11:27 AM)cardcrimson Wrote: https://www.sfgate.com/bayarea/article/b...343731.php
Any ranking that has Cal in top 5 for undergrad is dubious
Nobody who’s serious about academics takes Forbes seriously. Treat this as a lame attempt at humor.
Well, I got the joke. It would be nice to have reaction emoji here (like, etc.).
(I never could figure out much about how the current board software works, so I won't be the person to add that feature.)
(09-03-2023, 11:58 AM)CompSci87 Wrote:(09-03-2023, 08:41 AM)cardcrimson Wrote:(09-02-2023, 10:22 PM)TonyLima Wrote:Guess I should remember the audience. Got some laughs on another Stanford site. No sense of humor here, I should know that. . . .(09-02-2023, 12:39 PM)norcard10 Wrote:(09-02-2023, 11:27 AM)cardcrimson Wrote: https://www.sfgate.com/bayarea/article/b...343731.php
Any ranking that has Cal in top 5 for undergrad is dubious
Nobody who’s serious about academics takes Forbes seriously. Treat this as a lame attempt at humor.
Well, I got the joke. It would be nice to have reaction emoji here (like, etc.).
(I never could figure out much about how the current board software works, so I won't be the person to add that feature.)