01-01-2026, 09:32 AM
The Giants, it was claimed, had baserunning issues last year. Baseball reference.com has an interesting "miscellaneous baserunning stats" page, ranking each team in 31 baserunning categories.
2025 Major League Baseball Baserunning/Misc | Baseball-Reference.com
I asked four AI sites to evaluate each team's baserunning capabilities based on those 31 statistics and rank them in order.
PROMPT: You are a researcher on major league baseball. There are 30 teams. Your basis of expertise is baserunning, and your goal is to rank all 30 teams from #1 to #30 by their baserunning skill. In order to do that, I have attached a .csv file. The columns are all designated by acronyms, and there is an explanation of each acronym starting with line 35. The acronym is in column A, and the short description is in column B. All acronyms are listed between lines 36 and lines 68. The totals for each team are listed on lines #2 through #31, with the league average on line 33. Your goal is threefold: (1) Assess and rank the value of each metric in terms of contributing to each teams average score in terms of runs per game. (2) Calculate the overall baserunning expertise for each team and (3) List them in order from best baserunning team to worst.
Here are the SF Giants results from each tool as follows, with top three for eac:
ChatGPT: 13th in MLB (Yankees, Brewers, Dodgers)
Gemini: 19th (Dodgers, Mets, Tigers)
Grok: 22nd (Mets, Cubs, Yankees)
Perplexity: 26th (Mets, Cubs, Brewers)
ChatGPT explained their outlier: Giants are efficient, disciplined, not aggressive or explosive. Low mistake rates (caught stealing, pickoffs, out on basepaths), they're efficient at scoring runners (above league average), reads balls in play well, conservative decision making. Above average advancement on balls in play; e.g., they're situationally intelligent.
What holds them back is low aggression, no "elite" status anywhere.
Perplexity ranked them low for too many outs on base for a team that doesn't steal.
2025 Major League Baseball Baserunning/Misc | Baseball-Reference.com
I asked four AI sites to evaluate each team's baserunning capabilities based on those 31 statistics and rank them in order.
PROMPT: You are a researcher on major league baseball. There are 30 teams. Your basis of expertise is baserunning, and your goal is to rank all 30 teams from #1 to #30 by their baserunning skill. In order to do that, I have attached a .csv file. The columns are all designated by acronyms, and there is an explanation of each acronym starting with line 35. The acronym is in column A, and the short description is in column B. All acronyms are listed between lines 36 and lines 68. The totals for each team are listed on lines #2 through #31, with the league average on line 33. Your goal is threefold: (1) Assess and rank the value of each metric in terms of contributing to each teams average score in terms of runs per game. (2) Calculate the overall baserunning expertise for each team and (3) List them in order from best baserunning team to worst.
Here are the SF Giants results from each tool as follows, with top three for eac:
ChatGPT: 13th in MLB (Yankees, Brewers, Dodgers)
Gemini: 19th (Dodgers, Mets, Tigers)
Grok: 22nd (Mets, Cubs, Yankees)
Perplexity: 26th (Mets, Cubs, Brewers)
ChatGPT explained their outlier: Giants are efficient, disciplined, not aggressive or explosive. Low mistake rates (caught stealing, pickoffs, out on basepaths), they're efficient at scoring runners (above league average), reads balls in play well, conservative decision making. Above average advancement on balls in play; e.g., they're situationally intelligent.
What holds them back is low aggression, no "elite" status anywhere.
Perplexity ranked them low for too many outs on base for a team that doesn't steal.
Audaces fortuna iuvat
