Sac St game thread - Printable Version
+- The CardBoard (https://thecardboard.org/board)
+-- Forum: C-House! (https://thecardboard.org/board/forum-4.html)
+--- Forum: The CardBoard (https://thecardboard.org/board/forum-5.html)
+--- Thread: Sac St game thread (/thread-24425.html)
+- The CardBoard (https://thecardboard.org/board)
+-- Forum: C-House! (https://thecardboard.org/board/forum-4.html)
+--- Forum: The CardBoard (https://thecardboard.org/board/forum-5.html)
+--- Thread: Sac St game thread (/thread-24425.html)
RE: Sac St game thread - 82lsju - 09-16-2023
three and out....
(09-16-2023, 06:00 PM)norcard10 Wrote: TV won't show crowd - how bad is it?
KZSU announcers said similar crowd to end of last season....
RE: Sac St game thread - cardcrimson - 09-16-2023
This is not good. Daniels pick in the end zone the tide turner.
RE: Sac St game thread - old spanish trail - 09-16-2023
Their QB is better than ours.
RE: Sac St game thread - Bampa - 09-16-2023
First half...Sacto
QB has waaaaaaay too much time.
Recievers are waaaaaaay too open.
RE: Sac St game thread - Farm93 - 09-16-2023
(09-16-2023, 06:29 PM)Bampa Wrote: First half...SactoThe Hawaii v Oregon game, coupled with the Sac St v Stanford game leads me to believe these will be common observations.
QB has waaaaaaay too much time.
Recievers are waaaaaaay too open.
First half....(insert team)
QB of (insert team) has way too much time
Receivers are too open.
With a number of Voldemort hopefuls in the conference I think Stanford will give up 50+ to many teams in the conference.
RE: Sac St game thread - 82lsju - 09-16-2023
Lamson in at QB
false start, TO to avoid delay of game....not a good start to the second half...
FG Karty, 17-17...
RE: Sac St game thread - cardcrimson - 09-16-2023
What happened to party in the backfield?
RE: Sac St game thread - JohnR34231 - 09-16-2023
What's the deal with Yurosek?
He has done virtually nothing in the game so far.
Are they just doing a good job on him or what?
RE: Sac St game thread - 82lsju - 09-16-2023
that was big, pick inside the 10 (by us)....
RE: Sac St game thread - MV72018 - 09-16-2023
My puck, much criticized, of Sac State 28 and SU 24 is looking promising.
RE: Sac St game thread - cardcrimson - 09-16-2023
And we over throw a TD. . .and then a pick. Good god.
RE: Sac St game thread - 82lsju - 09-16-2023
and we give it back.....
leftcoast - Leftcoast - 09-16-2023
Re: Crowd
Middle sections of shady side about half full. Lower sunny side middle maybe at 25%. End zone lower section spotty. Whole sections of upper bowl empty.
RE: leftcoast - 82lsju - 09-16-2023
(09-16-2023, 07:13 PM)Leftcoast Wrote: Re: Crowd
Middle sections of shady side about half full. Lower sunny side middle maybe at 25%. End zone lower section spotty. Whole sections of upper bowl empty.
maybe time to bring back Ted's tarps....
RE: Sac St game thread - chrisk - 09-16-2023
Upper levels of FCS overlap’s significantly with lowere levels of FBS
RE: Sac St game thread - MV72018 - 09-16-2023
(09-16-2023, 06:25 PM)old spanish trail Wrote: Their QB is better than ours.
OBVIOUSLY!!!
(09-16-2023, 07:14 PM)82lsju Wrote:(09-16-2023, 07:13 PM)Leftcoast Wrote: Re: Crowd
Middle sections of shady side about half full. Lower sunny side middle maybe at 25%. End zone lower section spotty. Whole sections of upper bowl empty.
maybe time to bring back Ted's tarps....
Although still early, my prediction of Sac State over SU 28-24, is looking promising.
RE: Sac St game thread - 82lsju - 09-16-2023
FG Sac St now 17-20....
RE: Sac St game thread - martyup - 09-16-2023
(09-16-2023, 07:11 PM)MV72018 Wrote: My puck, much criticized, of Sac State 28 and SU 24 is looking promising.
Not for Stanford.
RE: Sac St game thread - 82lsju - 09-16-2023
INT, looked like a pick six but ruled down at the 35...
RE: Sac St game thread - TriangleTree - 09-16-2023
82lsju dateline='[url=tel:1694918409' Wrote: 1694918409[/url]']
INT, looked like a pick six but ruled down at the 35...
Why did we not challenge?!?