FOOTBALL: WAZZU Game Thread - Printable Version

FOOTBALL: WAZZU Game Thread - Printable Version

+- The CardBoard (https://thecardboard.org/board)
+-- Forum: C-House! (https://thecardboard.org/board/forum-4.html)
+--- Forum: The CardBoard (https://thecardboard.org/board/forum-5.html)
+--- Thread: FOOTBALL: WAZZU Game Thread (/thread-23662.html)

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

RE: FOOTBALL: WAZZU Game Thread - Austroturf - 11-05-2022

Oregon is dismantling Colorado, while Georgia is punking the Vols 24-6.

RE: FOOTBALL: WAZZU Game Thread - cardcrimson - 11-05-2022

KBK with an offsides. Ugh.

RE: FOOTBALL: WAZZU Game Thread - gailtate - 11-05-2022

(11-05-2022, 02:38 PM)cardcrimson Wrote:
(11-05-2022, 02:33 PM)PAsportsfan Wrote: Student section holding Stanford hates fun banner.

Stunning that there are enough students to hold the banner. . . .

Somebody should make a banner that says "Stanford hates football"

RE: FOOTBALL: WAZZU Game Thread - cardcrimson - 11-05-2022

Roughing the passer. Ugh.

Great coaching right now. . . .

RE: FOOTBALL: WAZZU Game Thread - martyup - 11-05-2022

We need WAZZU to execute the ultimate "Coug it"

I was coached not to call a fair catch inside the 10. That's twice today our guy called a fair catch at the 5.

RE: FOOTBALL: WAZZU Game Thread - cardcrimson - 11-05-2022

Can someone explain why you would fair catch a punt at the four?

RE: FOOTBALL: WAZZU Game Thread - PAsportsfan - 11-05-2022

Second fair catch inside the 5 yardline. Bad teams don’t even do that…

RE: FOOTBALL: WAZZU Game Thread - cardcrimson - 11-05-2022

And we follow that up with a false start. . . .

RE: FOOTBALL: WAZZU Game Thread - martyup - 11-05-2022

(11-05-2022, 03:10 PM)PAsportsfan Wrote: Second fair catch inside the 5 yardline. Bad teams don’t even do that…

"Well, he didn't execute those catches very well."

[Image: david-shaw.jpg]

RE: FOOTBALL: WAZZU Game Thread - BostonCard - 11-05-2022

(11-05-2022, 02:44 PM)MV72018 Wrote:
(11-05-2022, 02:43 PM)BostonCard Wrote: Did you have WSU on pace to win 84-14?

BC

No, I didn't, but then I underestimated how pathetically bad we are. I think I had it 27-17.

I think that’s what the poster meant when writing “we all failed”. Picking the winner in a pic ‘‘em game is a 50/50 thing. Picking the winner to dismantle the looser in a pic ‘‘em game is more challenging.

BC

RE: FOOTBALL: WAZZU Game Thread - Mick - 11-05-2022

(11-05-2022, 02:44 PM)martyup Wrote: Well, if we are going to lose I would rather we lose spectacularly to hopefully hasten a coaching change.

They had me at 42-7...

RE: FOOTBALL: WAZZU Game Thread - BostonCard - 11-05-2022

WSU with 205 yards rushing. They are the worst rushing team in the pac-12, save Stanford.

Really too bad that the Stanford running attack can’t go up against the Stanford efense (no “D”). The resístanle force versus the movable object.

BC

RE: FOOTBALL: WAZZU Game Thread - 81alum - 11-05-2022

I turned off the game after the scoop and score.

My personal answer to this is:
Sunday W Volleyball
Monday M Basketball
Monday W Basketball
Monday M Soccer

RE: FOOTBALL: WAZZU Game Thread - cardcrimson - 11-05-2022

Hey, come on guys, we held them to a field goal and we're winning the second half!

RE: FOOTBALL: WAZZU Game Thread - Phogge - 11-05-2022

Is there still a Council of Chiefs and do they have any power?

RE: FOOTBALL: WAZZU Game Thread - 81alum - 11-05-2022

(11-05-2022, 03:18 PM)BostonCard Wrote: WSU with 205 yards rushing. They are the worst rushing team in the pac-12, save Stanford.

Really too bad that the Stanford running attack can’t go up against the Stanford efense (no “D”). The resístanle force versus the movable object.

BC

The loss of two running backs to transfer has really come back to hurt us this year, in conjunction with the plethora of injuries. Since we can't attract transfers, we can't afford to lose them.

RE: FOOTBALL: WAZZU Game Thread - PAsportsfan - 11-05-2022

Shaw should “rest/save” McKee today and next week so he’ll be ready for the “job saving” Big Game.

RE: FOOTBALL: WAZZU Game Thread - cardcrimson - 11-05-2022

(11-05-2022, 03:26 PM)81alum Wrote:
(11-05-2022, 03:18 PM)BostonCard Wrote: WSU with 205 yards rushing. They are the worst rushing team in the pac-12, save Stanford.

Really too bad that the Stanford running attack can’t go up against the Stanford efense (no “D”). The resístanle force versus the movable object.

BC
The loss of two running backs to transfer has really come back to hurt us this year, in conjunction with the plethora of injuries. Since we can't attract transfers, we can't afford to lose them.

Three to the portal. Don't forget Arlen Harris Jr. . . . .

Why is McKee still in?

Good grief, even the play by play guy is blaming execution. . . .

RE: FOOTBALL: WAZZU Game Thread - winflop - 11-05-2022

(11-05-2022, 03:29 PM)cardcrimson Wrote:
(11-05-2022, 03:26 PM)81alum Wrote:
(11-05-2022, 03:18 PM)BostonCard Wrote: WSU with 205 yards rushing. They are the worst rushing team in the pac-12, save Stanford.

Really too bad that the Stanford running attack can’t go up against the Stanford efense (no “D”). The resístanle force versus the movable object.

BC
The loss of two running backs to transfer has really come back to hurt us this year, in conjunction with the plethora of injuries. Since we can't attract transfers, we can't afford to lose them.

Three to the portal. Don't forget Arlen Harris Jr. . . . .

Why is McKee still in?

Good grief, even the play by play guy is blaming execution. . . .

Gonna be a lot more than 3 if Muir stands pat

RE: FOOTBALL: WAZZU Game Thread - MV72018 - 11-05-2022

(11-05-2022, 03:16 PM)BostonCard Wrote:
(11-05-2022, 02:44 PM)MV72018 Wrote:
(11-05-2022, 02:43 PM)BostonCard Wrote: Did you have WSU on pace to win 84-14?

BC

No, I didn't, but then I underestimated how pathetically bad we are. I think I had it 27-17.

I think that’s what the poster meant when writing “we all failed”. Picking the winner in a pic ‘‘em game is a 50/50 thing. Picking the winner to dismantle the looser in a pic ‘‘em game is more challenging.

BC

Good point and call, BC.