The CardBoard
Larry Scott again - Printable Version

+- The CardBoard (https://thecardboard.org/board)
+-- Forum: C-House! (https://thecardboard.org/board/forum-4.html)
+--- Forum: The CardBoard (https://thecardboard.org/board/forum-5.html)
+--- Thread: Larry Scott again (/thread-20490.html)


Larry Scott again - qwerty49 - 09-21-2020

What a slimeball.  Moved up the date to pay $4M in bonuses to Pac-12 staff, including $2.5M to himself.  Then laid off >90 people. Sure, some of those laid off got bonuses, but real leaders have been known to forgo their own bonuses when the financial picture gets murky.

"He had a chance to be a hero -- but nope."

https://www.oregonlive.com/sports/john_canzano/2020/09/canzano-pac-12-commissioner-larry-scott-could-have-been-a-hero-but-nope.html

RE: Larry Scott again - Phogge - 09-21-2020

Plus they have been anti-union from the start.

RE: Larry Scott again - cardcrimson - 09-21-2020

(09-21-2020, 06:17 PM)Phogge Wrote:  Plus they have been anti-union from the start.
What does that have to do with Scott paying himself $2.5 million while he lays off a bunch of staff? And what union, not that it matters?

RE: Larry Scott again - OutsiderFan - 09-22-2020

(09-21-2020, 08:23 PM)cardcrimson Wrote:  
(09-21-2020, 06:17 PM)Phogge Wrote:  Plus they have been anti-union from the start.
What does that have to do with Scott paying himself $2.5 million while he lays off a bunch of staff? And what union, not that it matters?

It further cements what a POS Scott is.

RE: Larry Scott again - Phogge - 09-22-2020

They have been paying below level wages for years. No benefits to freelancers.
That is why it’s important sir. Do you have a problem with unions?

RE: Larry Scott again - cardcrimson - 09-22-2020

(09-22-2020, 04:19 AM)OutsiderFan Wrote:  
(09-21-2020, 08:23 PM)cardcrimson Wrote:  
(09-21-2020, 06:17 PM)Phogge Wrote:  Plus they have been anti-union from the start.
What does that have to do with Scott paying himself $2.5 million while he lays off a bunch of staff? And what union, not that it matters?

It further cements what a POS Scott is.

Opposed to unions for business of the Pac-12 cements him as a POS? I'm not defending the guy, my opinion is quite the opposite, just disagree that someone's position on unions makes them a POS. Strange times, I guess.
(09-22-2020, 04:42 AM)Phogge Wrote:  They have been paying below level wages for years. No benefits to freelancers.
That is why it’s important sir. Do you have a problem with unions?

Not for the players, but for the Pac-12 Network employees/freelancers. . . .wasn't sure where you were headed. I appreciate your point

And no, I have no issue with unions in general, especially in some areas. That said, the CA teachers union has done considerable harm to education in the state. Years ago we had a public school system that was among the best in the country, now, not so much. The inability to trim crappy teachers is a real problem.

And if the Pac-12 Network has been paying "below level wages for years", and people have been taking the jobs, it's not really below level, is it.

RE: Larry Scott again - Phogge - 09-22-2020

Sure it is. The decline of the labor movement in non contract freelance opportunities erodes solidarity for all in the entertainment industry. The strength of the ISTSE in Hollywood was built on the premise that hiring an IA crew insures that you will get top flight technicians and artists. In the give and take of contract negotiations we ceded strike provisions for a decent scale and exceptional benefits. While we witnessed a NABET strike at ABC decades ago that hampered the network and especially hurt the legion of freelancers depending on a fair wage the IA Hollywood locals don’t use a threat of strike and the producers appreciate it. Except for Disney which has to bite the Union bullet.

Wonder why the PAC 12’s material is so so? Can’t get the best people in the industry because many won’t work for sub par wages. Without the pioneers in the middle Twenties in our industry none of us would have the vacation pay, quick turn around protection and the option of spending our last days in the Motion Picture Home.

Union management in many industries is questionable. The movement however has provided many benefits to the workers and many benefits to the American people. We would be indentured servants without it. Watch the movie “The Assistant” to see what happens to someone without union protection.

RE: Larry Scott again - cardcrimson - 09-22-2020

(09-22-2020, 09:34 AM)Phogge Wrote:  Sure it is. The decline of the labor movement in non contract freelance opportunities erodes solidarity for all in the entertainment industry. The strength of the ISTSE in Hollywood was built on the premise that hiring an IA crew insures that you will get top flight technicians and artists. In the give and take of contract negotiations we ceded strike provisions for a decent scale and exceptional benefits. While we witnessed a NABET strike at ABC decades ago that hampered the network and especially hurt the legion of freelancers depending on a fair wage the IA Hollywood locals don’t use a threat of strike and the producers appreciate it. Except for Disney which has to bite the Union bullet.

Wonder why the PAC 12’s material is so so? Can’t get the best people in the industry because many won’t work for sub par wages. Without the pioneers in the middle Twenties in our industry none of us would have the vacation pay, quick turn around protection and the option of spending our last days in the Motion Picture Home.

Union management in many industries is questionable. The movement however has provided many benefits to the workers and many benefits to the American people. We would be indentured servants without it. Watch the movie “The Assistant” to see what happens to someone without union protection.

Can't disagree with any of your points. . . .unions provided protection that was sorely needed. 

Listened to the President of the United Steelworkers Union in the late 80's. US manufacturing was being crushed by the Japanese at the time, and his response on how to resolve the competitive imbalance? Unionize Japan. Had to laugh at that one. . . .

RE: Larry Scott again - Phogge - 09-22-2020

As for the negotiation process I sat in on one back in the 70's. Realized how important it was and how much I disliked sitting around the table. Bowed out and let those who enjoyed it to go for it. LOL.

RE: Larry Scott again - OutsiderFan - 09-22-2020

Get money out of politics and unions will have less power. but still enough to secure reasonable (I know its subjective) wages, benefits, and working conditions for workers.

My brother-in-law is an AV director for a CA JC and in a union. Even though JCs are closed, he's still getting paid. Students are paying for online classes, so the money to pay still exists.  If he wasn't in a union, he'd have been furloughed.  My beef isn' that he is being paid, it's that the State has no ability to have him do another job, like fire suppression, contact tracing, poll working. Whatever it is the state or County needs done.

As for Scott, not hiring union workers is shortsighted as Phogge suggested.  You aren't going to get people as skilled at their trades in the entertainment industry if using non-union labor.  It's a manifestation of how he has no problem taking more than he needs for himself, but aims to squeeze others.  That's what makes him a POS.

RE: Larry Scott again - BostonCard - 09-22-2020

(09-22-2020, 07:39 AM)cardcrimson Wrote:  And if the Pac-12 Network has been paying "below level wages for years", and people have been taking the jobs, it's not really below level, is it.

And if the Pac-12 has been paying Scott's salary for years, and the Presidents have been willing to pay that amount, is it not really above level?

While I generally agree with the importance of price signals and the laws of supply and demand, I also recognize that the labor market is imperfect, and within that imperfect market, monopsonies get away with underpaying, and the principal-agent problem mean that upper managers get away with overpaying themselves.

BC

RE: Larry Scott again - gailtate - 09-22-2020

(09-22-2020, 11:27 AM)BostonCard Wrote:  
(09-22-2020, 07:39 AM)cardcrimson Wrote:  And if the Pac-12 Network has been paying "below level wages for years", and people have been taking the jobs, it's not really below level, is it.

And if the Pac-12 has been paying Scott's salary for years, and the Presidents have been willing to pay that amount, is it not really above level?

While I generally agree with the importance of price signals and the laws of supply and demand, I also recognize that the labor market is imperfect, and within that imperfect market, monopsonies get away with underpaying, and the principal-agent problem mean that upper managers get away with overpaying themselves.

BC

Thanks for adding a new word to my limited vocab. Monopsony: "A market situation in which there is only one buyer. And it nothing to do with Sony.
Larry is still a cash-grubbing weasel, however.