The CardBoard
WBB: Results of the Week - Printable Version

+- The CardBoard (https://thecardboard.org/board)
+-- Forum: C-House! (https://thecardboard.org/board/forum-4.html)
+--- Forum: The CardBoard (https://thecardboard.org/board/forum-5.html)
+--- Thread: WBB: Results of the Week (/thread-24828.html)



WBB: Results of the Week - BobK - 03-03-2024

https://www.stanfordfbc.org/

Plus my all league team


RE: WBB: Results of the Week - BillBradley - 03-03-2024

Agree with most of your picks, but shouldn't Betts be on there? She was way better than Marshall in conference. If you don't want 3 from UCLA, I'd give it to Lauren instead of Rice.


RE: WBB: Results of the Week - BobK - 03-03-2024

Love your thought but disagree on Betts
If 15 yes


RE: WBB: Results of the Week - M T - 03-03-2024

(03-03-2024, 09:50 AM)BobK Wrote:  https://www.stanfordfbc.org/

Plus my all league team
If you can, in your summary, you might want to update Brink's  25/23 to 25/24.

But, this caused me to consider whether the 24th rebound is "official".  The box score attached to the game in the schedule GoStanford.com's site shows 24 (8+16) rebounds.  The recap for the game indicates 23 rebounds.  The StatBroadcast box score shows 23.  The ESPN site shows 23.  I do not see single-game highs at the NCAA stats site.  Stanford's WBB Historical Records has no 2024 data.

As of today, Stanford's season stats shows Brink as having 80 + 255 rebounds.  The NCAA season stats show the same numbers.
If I add up the numbers in each of the box scores from GoStanford, I get the same numbers.

The difference is apparently a defensive rebound that may be credited to Lepolo (StatBroadcast) or Brink (GoStanford).  It happened at 8:12 of the first quarter.
Iriafen blocks a shot which goes high in the air, well short of the basket. Brink catches it, takes a dribble, and shovels it to Lepolo.

It was legitimately and apparently officially a Brink rebound, tying Stanford's single game record with Chiney.

25 points and 24 rebounds.

Is she or isn't she?

When I was looking at the NCAA stats, another thing I ran into was a click-bait posting at the NCAA site  "A reason to believe in eachof the women's basketball selection committee's top-16 seeds".
For Stanford, it says (in part) "Cameron Brink and her dominant 6-foot, 6-inch frame comprise possibly the most impactful player in America — Brink leads the nation in player efficiency rating (PER) and win shares"

Does that author know more or less than I do?  Has she grown two inches, or does she just play like she did?


RE: WBB: Results of the Week - Jskass - 03-03-2024

Funny about Cam's height. I too noticed the discrepancy then wondered about the proofing of the article when I observed that they referred to more than one team as the Gamecocks!


RE: WBB: Results of the Week - crackpot - 03-03-2024

(03-03-2024, 12:28 PM)M T Wrote:  
(03-03-2024, 09:50 AM)BobK Wrote:  https://www.stanfordfbc.org/

Plus my all league team
If you can, in your summary, you might want to update Brink's  25/23 to 25/24.

But, this caused me to consider whether the 24th rebound is "official".  The box score attached to the game in the schedule GoStanford.com's site shows 24 (8+16) rebounds.  The recap for the game indicates 23 rebounds.  The StatBroadcast box score shows 23.  The ESPN site shows 23.  I do not see single-game highs at the NCAA stats site.  Stanford's WBB Historical Records has no 2024 data.

As of today, Stanford's season stats shows Brink as having 80 + 255 rebounds.  The NCAA season stats show the same numbers.
If I add up the numbers in each of the box scores from GoStanford, I get the same numbers.

The difference is apparently a defensive rebound that may be credited to Lepolo (StatBroadcast) or Brink (GoStanford).  It happened at 8:12 of the first quarter.
Iriafen blocks a shot which goes high in the air, well short of the basket. Brink catches it, takes a dribble, and shovels it to Lepolo.

It was legitimately and apparently officially a Brink rebound, tying Stanford's single game record with Chiney.

25 points and 24 rebounds.

Is she or isn't she?

When I was looking at the NCAA stats, another thing I ran into was a click-bait posting at the NCAA site  "A reason to believe in eachof the women's basketball selection committee's top-16 seeds".
For Stanford, it says (in part) "Cameron Brink and her dominant 6-foot, 6-inch frame comprise possibly the most impactful player in America — Brink leads the nation in player efficiency rating (PER) and win shares"

Does that author know more or less than I do?  Has she grown two inches, or does she just play like she did?

Shhhh!!! That's her younger sister, the 6'6" Christine, coming in next year.


RE: WBB: Results of the Week - BillBradley - 03-03-2024

(03-03-2024, 10:39 AM)BobK Wrote:  Love your thought but disagree on Betts
If 15 yes
How come? Way better than Marshall.


RE: WBB: Results of the Week - old spanish trail - 03-03-2024

(03-03-2024, 04:05 PM)BillBradley Wrote:  
(03-03-2024, 10:39 AM)BobK Wrote:  Love your thought but disagree on Betts
If 15 yes
How come? Way better than Marshall.

Agree Bradley. Betts had several crummy game stats, but dominated more often than not.