05-11-2010, 06:46 AM
Mainly because it\'s from the perspective OUTSIDE of the Pac-10 and not ginned up by the Pac\'s attendant, dependent cloud of bloggers and media types. Finally, someone makes the case from the prospective joining teams\' perspective. And it takes a swipe at Texas having to travel to backwaters like Eugene and...Seattle. (snicker) The author probably doesn\'t even know there\'s a place called Pullman.
Anyway, a better view of expansion than anything I\'ve seen from the Pac-10 hangers-on, maybe because it\'s talking about bring BIG dawgs into the conference. Most of the expansion opinions previous to this concentrated on squinting really hard to try to make adding Utah and BYU seem like it made sense.
http://www.texasmonthly.com/blogs/burkablog/?p=6958
Anyway, a better view of expansion than anything I\'ve seen from the Pac-10 hangers-on, maybe because it\'s talking about bring BIG dawgs into the conference. Most of the expansion opinions previous to this concentrated on squinting really hard to try to make adding Utah and BYU seem like it made sense.
http://www.texasmonthly.com/blogs/burkablog/?p=6958

