09-26-2016, 05:25 AM
Thanks for running the scoring pool, BC. I enjoy seeing my weekly shortcomings as a score estimator... :P
Audaces fortuna iuvat
Stanford @ UCLA predictions
Audaces fortuna iuvat
09-26-2016, 05:25 AM
Thanks for running the scoring pool, BC. I enjoy seeing my weekly shortcomings as a score estimator... :P
Audaces fortuna iuvat
09-26-2016, 10:35 AM
(09-25-2016, 11:35 PM)Card Fan in OR link Wrote:Holy cr_p, you mean now you are going to use the correct score? That put me down even further in the rankings. If you are going to use the actual score instead of what I think I thought it was going to be, I'm not going to play anymore. That's just not fair.
I have even more bad news for you, CFIO. I had Stanford 27-13 (same as Hank 91), but my prediction was not included in the final results spreadsheet. Any chance you could update it one more time, BC?
If there's one thing people have learned in Berkeley, it's that you can't put "Cal football" and "Rose Bowl" in the same sentence. The words just don't fit. You'd be better off linking "covered wagons" with "Mars travel." (Bruce Jenkins, Cal '70, SF Chronicle, Nov. 11, 2017)
(09-25-2016, 11:35 PM)Card Fan in OR link Wrote:Holy cr_p, you mean now you are going to use the correct score? That put me down even further in the rankings. If you are going to use the actual score instead of what I think I thought it was going to be, I'm not going to play anymore. That's just not fair.
I have even more bad news for you, CFIO. I had Stanford 27-13 (same as Hank 91), but my prediction was not included in the final results spreadsheet. Any chance you could update it one more time, BC?
If there's one thing people have learned in Berkeley, it's that you can't put "Cal football" and "Rose Bowl" in the same sentence. The words just don't fit. You'd be better off linking "covered wagons" with "Mars travel." (Bruce Jenkins, Cal '70, SF Chronicle, Nov. 11, 2017)
09-26-2016, 10:35 AM
(09-25-2016, 11:35 PM)Card Fan in OR link Wrote:Holy cr_p, you mean now you are going to use the correct score? That put me down even further in the rankings. If you are going to use the actual score instead of what I think I thought it was going to be, I'm not going to play anymore. That's just not fair.
I have even more bad news for you, CFIO. I had Stanford 27-13 (same as Hank 91), but my prediction was not included in the final results spreadsheet. Any chance you could update it one more time, BC?
If there's one thing people have learned in Berkeley, it's that you can't put "Cal football" and "Rose Bowl" in the same sentence. The words just don't fit. You'd be better off linking "covered wagons" with "Mars travel." (Bruce Jenkins, Cal '70, SF Chronicle, Nov. 11, 2017)
(09-25-2016, 11:35 PM)Card Fan in OR link Wrote:Holy cr_p, you mean now you are going to use the correct score? That put me down even further in the rankings. If you are going to use the actual score instead of what I think I thought it was going to be, I'm not going to play anymore. That's just not fair.
I have even more bad news for you, CFIO. I had Stanford 27-13 (same as Hank 91), but my prediction was not included in the final results spreadsheet. Any chance you could update it one more time, BC?
If there's one thing people have learned in Berkeley, it's that you can't put "Cal football" and "Rose Bowl" in the same sentence. The words just don't fit. You'd be better off linking "covered wagons" with "Mars travel." (Bruce Jenkins, Cal '70, SF Chronicle, Nov. 11, 2017)
09-26-2016, 11:15 AM
(09-26-2016, 10:35 AM)Papa John link Wrote:[quote author=Card Fan in OR link=topic=15712.msg173305#msg173305 date=1474871713]
Holy cr_p, you mean now you are going to use the correct score? That put me down even further in the rankings. If you are going to use the actual score instead of what I think I thought it was going to be, I'm not going to play anymore. That's just not fair.
I have even more bad news for you, CFIO. I had Stanford 27-13 (same as Hank 91), but my prediction was not included in the final results spreadsheet. Any chance you could update it one more time, BC?
[/quote]
I think I may be fired for my CFIO job. I added your score to the spreadsheet, though I may not update the posted scores.
BC
(09-26-2016, 10:35 AM)Papa John link Wrote:[quote author=Card Fan in OR link=topic=15712.msg173305#msg173305 date=1474871713]
Holy cr_p, you mean now you are going to use the correct score? That put me down even further in the rankings. If you are going to use the actual score instead of what I think I thought it was going to be, I'm not going to play anymore. That's just not fair.
I have even more bad news for you, CFIO. I had Stanford 27-13 (same as Hank 91), but my prediction was not included in the final results spreadsheet. Any chance you could update it one more time, BC?
[/quote]
I think I may be fired for my CFIO job. I added your score to the spreadsheet, though I may not update the posted scores.
BC
09-26-2016, 11:15 AM
(09-26-2016, 10:35 AM)Papa John link Wrote:[quote author=Card Fan in OR link=topic=15712.msg173305#msg173305 date=1474871713]
Holy cr_p, you mean now you are going to use the correct score? That put me down even further in the rankings. If you are going to use the actual score instead of what I think I thought it was going to be, I'm not going to play anymore. That's just not fair.
I have even more bad news for you, CFIO. I had Stanford 27-13 (same as Hank 91), but my prediction was not included in the final results spreadsheet. Any chance you could update it one more time, BC?
[/quote]
I think I may be fired for my CFIO job. I added your score to the spreadsheet, though I may not update the posted scores.
BC
(09-26-2016, 10:35 AM)Papa John link Wrote:[quote author=Card Fan in OR link=topic=15712.msg173305#msg173305 date=1474871713]
Holy cr_p, you mean now you are going to use the correct score? That put me down even further in the rankings. If you are going to use the actual score instead of what I think I thought it was going to be, I'm not going to play anymore. That's just not fair.
I have even more bad news for you, CFIO. I had Stanford 27-13 (same as Hank 91), but my prediction was not included in the final results spreadsheet. Any chance you could update it one more time, BC?
[/quote]
I think I may be fired for my CFIO job. I added your score to the spreadsheet, though I may not update the posted scores.
BC
09-26-2016, 11:20 AM
Boston Card, think you've got the wrong scores for me. I posted 23-10 for my prediction, and 34-33 as Bill Connelly's prediction. (I also put in 25-22 as the "Vegas" prediction.)
Boston Card, think you've got the wrong scores for me. I posted 23-10 for my prediction, and 34-33 as Bill Connelly's prediction. (I also put in 25-22 as the "Vegas" prediction.)
09-26-2016, 11:20 AM
Boston Card, think you've got the wrong scores for me. I posted 23-10 for my prediction, and 34-33 as Bill Connelly's prediction. (I also put in 25-22 as the "Vegas" prediction.)
Boston Card, think you've got the wrong scores for me. I posted 23-10 for my prediction, and 34-33 as Bill Connelly's prediction. (I also put in 25-22 as the "Vegas" prediction.)
09-26-2016, 11:22 AM
(09-20-2016, 12:51 PM)MSmith23 link Wrote:Stanford 27
UCLA 24
I think my prediction was missed again.
09-26-2016, 11:22 AM
(09-20-2016, 12:51 PM)MSmith23 link Wrote:Stanford 27
UCLA 24
I think my prediction was missed again.
09-26-2016, 11:25 AM
Clearly I had a lot on my mind over the week end. Sorry everyone. I will fix it when I get a chance. As always, I offer a money-back guarantee if you are unhappy with our service. And if there are any other errors, let me know sooner rather than later, BigEasyCard generates the pivot table aggregating the scores.
BC
BC
Clearly I had a lot on my mind over the week end. Sorry everyone. I will fix it when I get a chance. As always, I offer a money-back guarantee if you are unhappy with our service. And if there are any other errors, let me know sooner rather than later, BigEasyCard generates the pivot table aggregating the scores.
BC
BC
09-26-2016, 11:25 AM
Clearly I had a lot on my mind over the week end. Sorry everyone. I will fix it when I get a chance. As always, I offer a money-back guarantee if you are unhappy with our service. And if there are any other errors, let me know sooner rather than later, BigEasyCard generates the pivot table aggregating the scores.
BC
BC
Clearly I had a lot on my mind over the week end. Sorry everyone. I will fix it when I get a chance. As always, I offer a money-back guarantee if you are unhappy with our service. And if there are any other errors, let me know sooner rather than later, BigEasyCard generates the pivot table aggregating the scores.
BC
BC
09-26-2016, 11:32 AM
BC, since this seems like a pretty tedious, time-consuming, error-prone way to do this, why not make a google form? People can still submit scores in this thread to generate discussion, but anything not submitted via the form wouldn't count.
09-26-2016, 11:32 AM
BC, since this seems like a pretty tedious, time-consuming, error-prone way to do this, why not make a google form? People can still submit scores in this thread to generate discussion, but anything not submitted via the form wouldn't count.
09-26-2016, 11:35 AM
(09-26-2016, 11:32 AM)stupac2 link Wrote:BC, since this seems like a pretty tedious, time-consuming, error-prone way to do this, why not make a google form? People can still submit scores in this thread to generate discussion, but anything not submitted via the form wouldn't count.
Good idea. Why don't we try it for this week; people can still put their scores on via the message board if they don't want to use Google Forms, but I'll use the form if I can.
BC
(09-26-2016, 11:32 AM)stupac2 link Wrote:BC, since this seems like a pretty tedious, time-consuming, error-prone way to do this, why not make a google form? People can still submit scores in this thread to generate discussion, but anything not submitted via the form wouldn't count.
Good idea. Why don't we try it for this week; people can still put their scores on via the message board if they don't want to use Google Forms, but I'll use the form if I can.
BC
09-26-2016, 11:35 AM
(09-26-2016, 11:32 AM)stupac2 link Wrote:BC, since this seems like a pretty tedious, time-consuming, error-prone way to do this, why not make a google form? People can still submit scores in this thread to generate discussion, but anything not submitted via the form wouldn't count.
Good idea. Why don't we try it for this week; people can still put their scores on via the message board if they don't want to use Google Forms, but I'll use the form if I can.
BC
(09-26-2016, 11:32 AM)stupac2 link Wrote:BC, since this seems like a pretty tedious, time-consuming, error-prone way to do this, why not make a google form? People can still submit scores in this thread to generate discussion, but anything not submitted via the form wouldn't count.
Good idea. Why don't we try it for this week; people can still put their scores on via the message board if they don't want to use Google Forms, but I'll use the form if I can.
BC
09-26-2016, 11:45 AM
Once again, our defense outplayed our confidence in them. We must begin to believe. ;)
Put a glide in your stride and a dip in your hip.
09-26-2016, 11:45 AM
Once again, our defense outplayed our confidence in them. We must begin to believe. ;)
Put a glide in your stride and a dip in your hip.
09-26-2016, 11:46 AM
It is set up. The link is here:
https://goo.gl/forms/pRGYRscy3TmCngow1
Since this is a beta feature, I think for this week we ought to still have people enter scores the old fashioned way (also, it is fun to stimulate discussion, and also, I love the nicknames people come up with for our opponents).
BC
https://goo.gl/forms/pRGYRscy3TmCngow1
Since this is a beta feature, I think for this week we ought to still have people enter scores the old fashioned way (also, it is fun to stimulate discussion, and also, I love the nicknames people come up with for our opponents).
BC
It is set up. The link is here:
https://goo.gl/forms/pRGYRscy3TmCngow1
Since this is a beta feature, I think for this week we ought to still have people enter scores the old fashioned way (also, it is fun to stimulate discussion, and also, I love the nicknames people come up with for our opponents).
BC
https://goo.gl/forms/pRGYRscy3TmCngow1
Since this is a beta feature, I think for this week we ought to still have people enter scores the old fashioned way (also, it is fun to stimulate discussion, and also, I love the nicknames people come up with for our opponents).
BC
09-26-2016, 11:46 AM
It is set up. The link is here:
https://goo.gl/forms/pRGYRscy3TmCngow1
Since this is a beta feature, I think for this week we ought to still have people enter scores the old fashioned way (also, it is fun to stimulate discussion, and also, I love the nicknames people come up with for our opponents).
BC
https://goo.gl/forms/pRGYRscy3TmCngow1
Since this is a beta feature, I think for this week we ought to still have people enter scores the old fashioned way (also, it is fun to stimulate discussion, and also, I love the nicknames people come up with for our opponents).
BC
It is set up. The link is here:
https://goo.gl/forms/pRGYRscy3TmCngow1
Since this is a beta feature, I think for this week we ought to still have people enter scores the old fashioned way (also, it is fun to stimulate discussion, and also, I love the nicknames people come up with for our opponents).
BC
https://goo.gl/forms/pRGYRscy3TmCngow1
Since this is a beta feature, I think for this week we ought to still have people enter scores the old fashioned way (also, it is fun to stimulate discussion, and also, I love the nicknames people come up with for our opponents).
BC
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »