12-03-2016, 12:14 AM
(12-02-2016, 11:23 PM)Farm93 link Wrote:The QB injury was actually the best case for the anti-SC crew.
Colorado can claim they are great when their QB is healthy, and really only looked awful when their QB was out (Michigan, Washington). The ankle will be fine on January 1. Therefore the good Colorado should be in Pasadena as Pac-12 South champs. Under Stanford Control (again) needed Colorado, with a healthy QB, to lose big. Simply, the injury excuses the loss. Committee has been very consistent in not penalizing CG losers. Just think last year when Stanford playing and winning a CG didn't pass Iowa.Â
Hard to believe a team losing because their QB was hurt, will fall behind a team, with one less win BTW, that did not win that same division. Everyone can imagine Under Stanford Control (again) without their current starting QB because that team went 1-3.Â
UW - CFP
Colorado - Rose Bowl
Under Stanford Control (again) - Alamo/Cotton (Texas either way)
And then the cascade down from there.Â
LA Times agrees (and doesn't like it): Even if Colorado loses in Pac-12 title game, USC could be out of Rose Bowl, but it shouldn't

