02-03-2017, 09:15 AM
He's not counting against the scholarship limit...give him a chance to see what he can do. No skin off our backs.
(02-02-2017, 12:58 PM)Mick link Wrote:[quote author=slide link=topic=16537.msg187945#msg187945 date=1486060337]
no offer from Stanford. Phillips will be a walk-on. per one of the recruiting sites, he had offers from Navy, BYU, Wyoming, Nevada, Army, Harvard, Yale and Princeton. probably not just a pine rider in the Ivies.Â
110 tackles his SR year, 2 INTs with 1 returned for a TD.Â
named 1st team all San Diego. looks like a good walk-on candidate.
http://sfcsathletics.net/news/2016/12/21...diego.aspx
(02-02-2017, 12:58 PM)Mick link Wrote:[quote author=slide link=topic=16537.msg187945#msg187945 date=1486060337]
no offer from Stanford. Phillips will be a walk-on. per one of the recruiting sites, he had offers from Navy, BYU, Wyoming, Nevada, Army, Harvard, Yale and Princeton. probably not just a pine rider in the Ivies.Â
110 tackles his SR year, 2 INTs with 1 returned for a TD.Â
named 1st team all San Diego. looks like a good walk-on candidate.
http://sfcsathletics.net/news/2016/12/21...diego.aspx
(02-02-2017, 08:10 PM)CTcard link Wrote:The term preferred walkon, that I have seen Stanford and others use, has no meaning to the NCAA as far as I know.
(02-02-2017, 08:10 PM)CTcard link Wrote:The term preferred walkon, that I have seen Stanford and others use, has no meaning to the NCAA as far as I know.
(02-03-2017, 09:52 AM)washingtonismoney link Wrote:[quote author=CTcard link=topic=16537.msg187999#msg187999 date=1486091447]
The term preferred walkon, that I have seen Stanford and others use, has no meaning to the NCAA as far as I know.
(02-03-2017, 09:52 AM)washingtonismoney link Wrote:[quote author=CTcard link=topic=16537.msg187999#msg187999 date=1486091447]
The term preferred walkon, that I have seen Stanford and others use, has no meaning to the NCAA as far as I know.
(02-02-2017, 08:10 PM)CTcard link Wrote:If I have this straight, any "recruited walk on" who receives any financial aid from the school becomes a counter the moment they appear in any game.
A "recruited walk on" means that the coach contacts the athlete off campus, the athlete takes an official visit, and maybe a couple of other things.
There may be some updates, but I think that is basically the rule.
Coaches often go to great lengths to ... encourage an athlete without recruiting them.
The term preferred walkon, that I have seen Stanford and others use, has no meaning to the NCAA as far as I know.
----
Now someone who knows better can come in and correct me.
(02-02-2017, 08:10 PM)CTcard link Wrote:If I have this straight, any "recruited walk on" who receives any financial aid from the school becomes a counter the moment they appear in any game.
A "recruited walk on" means that the coach contacts the athlete off campus, the athlete takes an official visit, and maybe a couple of other things.
There may be some updates, but I think that is basically the rule.
Coaches often go to great lengths to ... encourage an athlete without recruiting them.
The term preferred walkon, that I have seen Stanford and others use, has no meaning to the NCAA as far as I know.
----
Now someone who knows better can come in and correct me.
(02-10-2017, 03:49 PM)StanfordIndians1 link Wrote:And also it's not an "official visit". It's an unofficial visit. Difference being and official visit means Stanford will pay for everything for the visit-flight etc. That isn't going to happen for a walk on
(02-10-2017, 03:49 PM)StanfordIndians1 link Wrote:And also it's not an "official visit". It's an unofficial visit. Difference being and official visit means Stanford will pay for everything for the visit-flight etc. That isn't going to happen for a walk on
(02-10-2017, 03:01 PM)dadof3sons link Wrote:I have it on good authority (from a Cardinal Coach) they think Phillips may just be the most talented "preferred" walk-on they have had as a coaching staff. They will redshirt him, he'll add 30-40 pounds (he has the frame). I was told they actually see him as a 3 year starter as an OLB, so let's not write him off quite yet. :) :)
(02-10-2017, 03:01 PM)dadof3sons link Wrote:I have it on good authority (from a Cardinal Coach) they think Phillips may just be the most talented "preferred" walk-on they have had as a coaching staff. They will redshirt him, he'll add 30-40 pounds (he has the frame). I was told they actually see him as a 3 year starter as an OLB, so let's not write him off quite yet. :) :)
(02-10-2017, 03:01 PM)dadof3sons link Wrote:I have it on good authority (from a Cardinal Coach) they think Phillips may just be the most talented "preferred" walk-on they have had as a coaching staff. They will redshirt him, he'll add 30-40 pounds (he has the frame). I was told they actually see him as a 3 year starter as an OLB, so let's not write him off quite yet. :) :)
(02-10-2017, 03:01 PM)dadof3sons link Wrote:I have it on good authority (from a Cardinal Coach) they think Phillips may just be the most talented "preferred" walk-on they have had as a coaching staff. They will redshirt him, he'll add 30-40 pounds (he has the frame). I was told they actually see him as a 3 year starter as an OLB, so let's not write him off quite yet. :) :)
(02-02-2017, 12:58 PM)Mick link Wrote:[quote author=slide link=topic=16537.msg187945#msg187945 date=1486060337]
no offer from Stanford. Phillips will be a walk-on. per one of the recruiting sites, he had offers from Navy, BYU, Wyoming, Nevada, Army, Harvard, Yale and Princeton. probably not just a pine rider in the Ivies.Â
110 tackles his SR year, 2 INTs with 1 returned for a TD.Â
named 1st team all San Diego. looks like a good walk-on candidate.
http://sfcsathletics.net/news/2016/12/21...diego.aspx
(02-02-2017, 12:58 PM)Mick link Wrote:[quote author=slide link=topic=16537.msg187945#msg187945 date=1486060337]
no offer from Stanford. Phillips will be a walk-on. per one of the recruiting sites, he had offers from Navy, BYU, Wyoming, Nevada, Army, Harvard, Yale and Princeton. probably not just a pine rider in the Ivies.Â
110 tackles his SR year, 2 INTs with 1 returned for a TD.Â
named 1st team all San Diego. looks like a good walk-on candidate.
http://sfcsathletics.net/news/2016/12/21...diego.aspx
(02-11-2017, 11:44 AM)JPRI link Wrote:Each year we seem to pick out a walk on and get all hot and tingly over him. Hey, he could be a star, look at Ryan and Griff and David. Nothing really wrong with it I guess, even though the odds are he won't be.
(02-11-2017, 11:44 AM)JPRI link Wrote:Each year we seem to pick out a walk on and get all hot and tingly over him. Hey, he could be a star, look at Ryan and Griff and David. Nothing really wrong with it I guess, even though the odds are he won't be.
(02-11-2017, 03:11 PM)terry link Wrote:[quote author=JPRI link=topic=16537.msg188515#msg188515 date=1486838651]
Each year we seem to pick out a walk on and get all hot and tingly over him. Hey, he could be a star, look at Ryan and Griff and David. Nothing really wrong with it I guess, even though the odds are he won't be.
(02-11-2017, 03:11 PM)terry link Wrote:[quote author=JPRI link=topic=16537.msg188515#msg188515 date=1486838651]
Each year we seem to pick out a walk on and get all hot and tingly over him. Hey, he could be a star, look at Ryan and Griff and David. Nothing really wrong with it I guess, even though the odds are he won't be.
(02-11-2017, 01:54 PM)leftcoast link Wrote:A kid loves Stanford, loves ball and is willing to play for the team without a Football scholly.Â
As long as he dreams big and wears red in Palo Alto I'll root for him.Â
Now come on you skeptics - Sheath those claws! :-)
(02-11-2017, 01:54 PM)leftcoast link Wrote:A kid loves Stanford, loves ball and is willing to play for the team without a Football scholly.Â
As long as he dreams big and wears red in Palo Alto I'll root for him.Â
Now come on you skeptics - Sheath those claws! :-)