08-26-2017, 09:30 PM
Can we put Costello in? Burn has just not looked good, I want to at least see someone we haven't before.
Stanford - Rice game thread
08-26-2017, 09:33 PM
(08-26-2017, 09:16 PM)Publius link Wrote:Did anybody else catch a glimpse of Arcega-Whiteside dressed on the sideline? That's a good sign.
Shaw mentioned in a pre-game radio interview that JJAW went through warm-ups with the team, but would not play. He seemed to indicate that he was on track to be back soon.
(08-26-2017, 09:16 PM)Publius link Wrote:Did anybody else catch a glimpse of Arcega-Whiteside dressed on the sideline? That's a good sign.
Shaw mentioned in a pre-game radio interview that JJAW went through warm-ups with the team, but would not play. He seemed to indicate that he was on track to be back soon.
08-26-2017, 09:42 PM
(08-26-2017, 08:35 PM)Redrum link Wrote:I love rugby but this whole sideline byplay with announcer and pro rugby player is just a waste. And a reall pisser.Agreed--yugely annoying. Glad my mute button works.
Pax et Bonum
(08-26-2017, 08:35 PM)Redrum link Wrote:I love rugby but this whole sideline byplay with announcer and pro rugby player is just a waste. And a reall pisser.Agreed--yugely annoying. Glad my mute button works.
Pax et Bonum
08-26-2017, 09:51 PM
(08-26-2017, 09:49 PM)GoodGrief link Wrote:holy cow Costello looks good!
Seriously. On target and decisive. Honestly he might even look better than Chryst, though I have no idea if Rice still has the 1's in.
08-26-2017, 09:56 PM
(08-26-2017, 08:49 PM)Card15 link Wrote:Chip Kelly mentioning Zach Ertz was great. Stanford-Oregon 2012?
KELLY probably thinks about his time coaching Ertz in Philly more than that game.
08-26-2017, 09:57 PM
Perez is in, even though we wasn't on the depth chart. And . . . Rice is moving the ball. :-\
Put a glide in your stride and a dip in your hip.
08-26-2017, 09:58 PM
(08-26-2017, 09:51 PM)stupac2 link Wrote:[quote author=GoodGrief link=topic=17233.msg198092#msg198092 date=1503809342]
holy cow Costello looks good!
Seriously. On target and decisive. Honestly he might even look better than Chryst, though I have no idea if Rice still has the 1's in.
[/quote]
I'd like to see Costello vs the 1s. It's too bad we don't have another warm up game before SC.
(08-26-2017, 09:51 PM)stupac2 link Wrote:[quote author=GoodGrief link=topic=17233.msg198092#msg198092 date=1503809342]
holy cow Costello looks good!
Seriously. On target and decisive. Honestly he might even look better than Chryst, though I have no idea if Rice still has the 1's in.
[/quote]
I'd like to see Costello vs the 1s. It's too bad we don't have another warm up game before SC.
08-26-2017, 10:02 PM
Rice is overmatched and demoralized. I am delighted that we look so good, but Rice is contributing to this. Have we gotten much real pressure on Rice's qb's? I am soooo looking forward to our game vs. U.S.C. They might actually underestimate us by thinking too much of this is because Rice is so weak.
"It's not what you don't know that gets you in trouble. It's what you think you know that just isn't so."
Mark Twain
Rice is overmatched and demoralized. I am delighted that we look so good, but Rice is contributing to this. Have we gotten much real pressure on Rice's qb's? I am soooo looking forward to our game vs. U.S.C. They might actually underestimate us by thinking too much of this is because Rice is so weak.
"It's not what you don't know that gets you in trouble. It's what you think you know that just isn't so."
Mark Twain
08-26-2017, 10:06 PM
Gotta say, Sydney looks amazing. And for Rice, this is a tough game, but this is a great experience, since it looks like this is the closest they will get to a bowl game.
BC
BC
Gotta say, Sydney looks amazing. And for Rice, this is a tough game, but this is a great experience, since it looks like this is the closest they will get to a bowl game.
BC
BC
08-26-2017, 10:09 PM
No doubt Shaw is using Frosh if they can contribute right away.Â
+ Wedington is a starter (or in a lot), as alternative to B.the.Love.
+ All the TEs are going to be available and pose matchup headaches for LBs.Â
+ Sarell & Little will NOT red-shirt; that seems clear.Â
- Did not see Lund (#25) at RB
- No action by DW Perry at DT (#50)
- Did not see OSt.Brown (#81) at WR... red shirt? Shaw seems happy with the WR/TE Corp.
With Davis Mills waiting in the wings behind Costello, and Tonner McKee (6'6" 220) lined up for 2018, we are solid at QB through 2022.Â
Agree with comments above -- Costello > Burns.Â
+ Wedington is a starter (or in a lot), as alternative to B.the.Love.
+ All the TEs are going to be available and pose matchup headaches for LBs.Â
+ Sarell & Little will NOT red-shirt; that seems clear.Â
- Did not see Lund (#25) at RB
- No action by DW Perry at DT (#50)
- Did not see OSt.Brown (#81) at WR... red shirt? Shaw seems happy with the WR/TE Corp.
With Davis Mills waiting in the wings behind Costello, and Tonner McKee (6'6" 220) lined up for 2018, we are solid at QB through 2022.Â
Agree with comments above -- Costello > Burns.Â
Just love slamming those over-hyped beach body schools.
If you heard Cal Sucks, you'd be right.
No doubt Shaw is using Frosh if they can contribute right away.Â
+ Wedington is a starter (or in a lot), as alternative to B.the.Love.
+ All the TEs are going to be available and pose matchup headaches for LBs.Â
+ Sarell & Little will NOT red-shirt; that seems clear.Â
- Did not see Lund (#25) at RB
- No action by DW Perry at DT (#50)
- Did not see OSt.Brown (#81) at WR... red shirt? Shaw seems happy with the WR/TE Corp.
With Davis Mills waiting in the wings behind Costello, and Tonner McKee (6'6" 220) lined up for 2018, we are solid at QB through 2022.Â
Agree with comments above -- Costello > Burns.Â
+ Wedington is a starter (or in a lot), as alternative to B.the.Love.
+ All the TEs are going to be available and pose matchup headaches for LBs.Â
+ Sarell & Little will NOT red-shirt; that seems clear.Â
- Did not see Lund (#25) at RB
- No action by DW Perry at DT (#50)
- Did not see OSt.Brown (#81) at WR... red shirt? Shaw seems happy with the WR/TE Corp.
With Davis Mills waiting in the wings behind Costello, and Tonner McKee (6'6" 220) lined up for 2018, we are solid at QB through 2022.Â
Agree with comments above -- Costello > Burns.Â
Just love slamming those over-hyped beach body schools.
If you heard Cal Sucks, you'd be right.
McKee will take a mission, so he might as well be a 2020 QB.
BC
BC
08-26-2017, 10:12 PM
The amazing stat is that we have Over 350 yards of passing offense, yet no receiver has more than 60 yards.
BC
BC
The amazing stat is that we have Over 350 yards of passing offense, yet no receiver has more than 60 yards.
BC
BC
08-26-2017, 10:12 PM
Weddington is putting on a clinic.
Put a glide in your stride and a dip in your hip.
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »