11-11-2017, 04:49 PM
![[Image: crying-2.gif?w=1000]](http://usatftw.files.wordpress.com/2013/11/crying-2.gif?w=1000)
Enjoy your crying Huff meme.
BC
The best performances of the Shaw/Harbaugh era
Enjoy your crying Huff meme.
BC
11-11-2017, 05:05 PM
I dont know if it was the best performance of the Shaw era, but that second and third quarter were phenomenal. After going up 14-7 and stopping us on our third drive, it was not looking like it would be one of Shaws best games. And then this happened...
UW: 8 plays, 59 yards, turnover on downs
SU: 10 plays, 61 yards, FG
UW: 3 plays, 8 yards, punt
SU: 3 plays, 22 yards, end of half
UW: 3 plays, 3 yards, punt
SU: 9 plays, 65 yards, TD
UW: 5 plays, 28 yards, punt
SU: 13 plays, 81 yards, FG
UW: 2 plays, 6 yards, Fumble
SU: 6 plays, 17 yards, FG
UW: 3 plays, -19 yards, punt
SU: 2 plays, 14 yards, TD
Each team had 6 drives:
UW: 24 plays, 85 yards, 0 points (4 plays per drive, 12.5 yards per drive, 0 points per drive, 3.5 ypp)
SU: 43 plays, 260 yards, 23 points (7 plays per drive, 43 yards per drive, 3.8 points per drive, 6 ypp)
BC
UW: 8 plays, 59 yards, turnover on downs
SU: 10 plays, 61 yards, FG
UW: 3 plays, 8 yards, punt
SU: 3 plays, 22 yards, end of half
UW: 3 plays, 3 yards, punt
SU: 9 plays, 65 yards, TD
UW: 5 plays, 28 yards, punt
SU: 13 plays, 81 yards, FG
UW: 2 plays, 6 yards, Fumble
SU: 6 plays, 17 yards, FG
UW: 3 plays, -19 yards, punt
SU: 2 plays, 14 yards, TD
Each team had 6 drives:
UW: 24 plays, 85 yards, 0 points (4 plays per drive, 12.5 yards per drive, 0 points per drive, 3.5 ypp)
SU: 43 plays, 260 yards, 23 points (7 plays per drive, 43 yards per drive, 3.8 points per drive, 6 ypp)
BC
I dont know if it was the best performance of the Shaw era, but that second and third quarter were phenomenal. After going up 14-7 and stopping us on our third drive, it was not looking like it would be one of Shaws best games. And then this happened...
UW: 8 plays, 59 yards, turnover on downs
SU: 10 plays, 61 yards, FG
UW: 3 plays, 8 yards, punt
SU: 3 plays, 22 yards, end of half
UW: 3 plays, 3 yards, punt
SU: 9 plays, 65 yards, TD
UW: 5 plays, 28 yards, punt
SU: 13 plays, 81 yards, FG
UW: 2 plays, 6 yards, Fumble
SU: 6 plays, 17 yards, FG
UW: 3 plays, -19 yards, punt
SU: 2 plays, 14 yards, TD
Each team had 6 drives:
UW: 24 plays, 85 yards, 0 points (4 plays per drive, 12.5 yards per drive, 0 points per drive, 3.5 ypp)
SU: 43 plays, 260 yards, 23 points (7 plays per drive, 43 yards per drive, 3.8 points per drive, 6 ypp)
BC
UW: 8 plays, 59 yards, turnover on downs
SU: 10 plays, 61 yards, FG
UW: 3 plays, 8 yards, punt
SU: 3 plays, 22 yards, end of half
UW: 3 plays, 3 yards, punt
SU: 9 plays, 65 yards, TD
UW: 5 plays, 28 yards, punt
SU: 13 plays, 81 yards, FG
UW: 2 plays, 6 yards, Fumble
SU: 6 plays, 17 yards, FG
UW: 3 plays, -19 yards, punt
SU: 2 plays, 14 yards, TD
Each team had 6 drives:
UW: 24 plays, 85 yards, 0 points (4 plays per drive, 12.5 yards per drive, 0 points per drive, 3.5 ypp)
SU: 43 plays, 260 yards, 23 points (7 plays per drive, 43 yards per drive, 3.8 points per drive, 6 ypp)
BC
11-11-2017, 05:05 PM
I dont know if it was the best performance of the Shaw era, but that second and third quarter were phenomenal. After going up 14-7 and stopping us on our third drive, it was not looking like it would be one of Shaws best games. And then this happened...
UW: 8 plays, 59 yards, turnover on downs
SU: 10 plays, 61 yards, FG
UW: 3 plays, 8 yards, punt
SU: 3 plays, 22 yards, end of half
UW: 3 plays, 3 yards, punt
SU: 9 plays, 65 yards, TD
UW: 5 plays, 28 yards, punt
SU: 13 plays, 81 yards, FG
UW: 2 plays, 6 yards, Fumble
SU: 6 plays, 17 yards, FG
UW: 3 plays, -19 yards, punt
SU: 2 plays, 14 yards, TD
Each team had 6 drives:
UW: 24 plays, 85 yards, 0 points (4 plays per drive, 12.5 yards per drive, 0 points per drive, 3.5 ypp)
SU: 43 plays, 260 yards, 23 points (7 plays per drive, 43 yards per drive, 3.8 points per drive, 6 ypp)
BC
UW: 8 plays, 59 yards, turnover on downs
SU: 10 plays, 61 yards, FG
UW: 3 plays, 8 yards, punt
SU: 3 plays, 22 yards, end of half
UW: 3 plays, 3 yards, punt
SU: 9 plays, 65 yards, TD
UW: 5 plays, 28 yards, punt
SU: 13 plays, 81 yards, FG
UW: 2 plays, 6 yards, Fumble
SU: 6 plays, 17 yards, FG
UW: 3 plays, -19 yards, punt
SU: 2 plays, 14 yards, TD
Each team had 6 drives:
UW: 24 plays, 85 yards, 0 points (4 plays per drive, 12.5 yards per drive, 0 points per drive, 3.5 ypp)
SU: 43 plays, 260 yards, 23 points (7 plays per drive, 43 yards per drive, 3.8 points per drive, 6 ypp)
BC
I dont know if it was the best performance of the Shaw era, but that second and third quarter were phenomenal. After going up 14-7 and stopping us on our third drive, it was not looking like it would be one of Shaws best games. And then this happened...
UW: 8 plays, 59 yards, turnover on downs
SU: 10 plays, 61 yards, FG
UW: 3 plays, 8 yards, punt
SU: 3 plays, 22 yards, end of half
UW: 3 plays, 3 yards, punt
SU: 9 plays, 65 yards, TD
UW: 5 plays, 28 yards, punt
SU: 13 plays, 81 yards, FG
UW: 2 plays, 6 yards, Fumble
SU: 6 plays, 17 yards, FG
UW: 3 plays, -19 yards, punt
SU: 2 plays, 14 yards, TD
Each team had 6 drives:
UW: 24 plays, 85 yards, 0 points (4 plays per drive, 12.5 yards per drive, 0 points per drive, 3.5 ypp)
SU: 43 plays, 260 yards, 23 points (7 plays per drive, 43 yards per drive, 3.8 points per drive, 6 ypp)
BC
UW: 8 plays, 59 yards, turnover on downs
SU: 10 plays, 61 yards, FG
UW: 3 plays, 8 yards, punt
SU: 3 plays, 22 yards, end of half
UW: 3 plays, 3 yards, punt
SU: 9 plays, 65 yards, TD
UW: 5 plays, 28 yards, punt
SU: 13 plays, 81 yards, FG
UW: 2 plays, 6 yards, Fumble
SU: 6 plays, 17 yards, FG
UW: 3 plays, -19 yards, punt
SU: 2 plays, 14 yards, TD
Each team had 6 drives:
UW: 24 plays, 85 yards, 0 points (4 plays per drive, 12.5 yards per drive, 0 points per drive, 3.5 ypp)
SU: 43 plays, 260 yards, 23 points (7 plays per drive, 43 yards per drive, 3.8 points per drive, 6 ypp)
BC
11-11-2017, 05:18 PM
Ah yes, the Crying Game.
Remember Dux getting uncomfortably close after returning a blocked FG for a TD.
Was this the game when turtling was coined?
Remember Dux getting uncomfortably close after returning a blocked FG for a TD.
Was this the game when turtling was coined?
Yeah, I just stare at my desk, but it looks like I'm working .I'd say in a given week I probably only do about fifteen minutes of real, actual, work. Peter Gibbons
Ah yes, the Crying Game.
Remember Dux getting uncomfortably close after returning a blocked FG for a TD.
Was this the game when turtling was coined?
Remember Dux getting uncomfortably close after returning a blocked FG for a TD.
Was this the game when turtling was coined?
Yeah, I just stare at my desk, but it looks like I'm working .I'd say in a given week I probably only do about fifteen minutes of real, actual, work. Peter Gibbons
11-11-2017, 05:18 PM
Ah yes, the Crying Game.
Remember Dux getting uncomfortably close after returning a blocked FG for a TD.
Was this the game when turtling was coined?
Remember Dux getting uncomfortably close after returning a blocked FG for a TD.
Was this the game when turtling was coined?
Yeah, I just stare at my desk, but it looks like I'm working .I'd say in a given week I probably only do about fifteen minutes of real, actual, work. Peter Gibbons
Ah yes, the Crying Game.
Remember Dux getting uncomfortably close after returning a blocked FG for a TD.
Was this the game when turtling was coined?
Remember Dux getting uncomfortably close after returning a blocked FG for a TD.
Was this the game when turtling was coined?
Yeah, I just stare at my desk, but it looks like I'm working .I'd say in a given week I probably only do about fifteen minutes of real, actual, work. Peter Gibbons
11-11-2017, 05:40 PM
(11-11-2017, 05:18 PM)jacketree link Wrote:Ah yes, the Crying Game.
Remember Dux getting uncomfortably close after returning a blocked FG for a TD.
Was this the game when turtling was coined?
Granted it's been a few years, but I don't think we were turtling that game, that was just our strategy that year and specifically for that game. Take a loooooot of time on each drive and get what points you can. It just happens that Oregon was built for lightning speed attacks, so nothing was safe against them. That said, the tone of the game definitely changed after the blocked FG. If that doesn't happen, we might've won by 20.
(11-11-2017, 05:18 PM)jacketree link Wrote:Ah yes, the Crying Game.
Remember Dux getting uncomfortably close after returning a blocked FG for a TD.
Was this the game when turtling was coined?
Granted it's been a few years, but I don't think we were turtling that game, that was just our strategy that year and specifically for that game. Take a loooooot of time on each drive and get what points you can. It just happens that Oregon was built for lightning speed attacks, so nothing was safe against them. That said, the tone of the game definitely changed after the blocked FG. If that doesn't happen, we might've won by 20.
11-11-2017, 05:40 PM
(11-11-2017, 05:18 PM)jacketree link Wrote:Ah yes, the Crying Game.
Remember Dux getting uncomfortably close after returning a blocked FG for a TD.
Was this the game when turtling was coined?
Granted it's been a few years, but I don't think we were turtling that game, that was just our strategy that year and specifically for that game. Take a loooooot of time on each drive and get what points you can. It just happens that Oregon was built for lightning speed attacks, so nothing was safe against them. That said, the tone of the game definitely changed after the blocked FG. If that doesn't happen, we might've won by 20.
(11-11-2017, 05:18 PM)jacketree link Wrote:Ah yes, the Crying Game.
Remember Dux getting uncomfortably close after returning a blocked FG for a TD.
Was this the game when turtling was coined?
Granted it's been a few years, but I don't think we were turtling that game, that was just our strategy that year and specifically for that game. Take a loooooot of time on each drive and get what points you can. It just happens that Oregon was built for lightning speed attacks, so nothing was safe against them. That said, the tone of the game definitely changed after the blocked FG. If that doesn't happen, we might've won by 20.
11-11-2017, 06:06 PM
(11-11-2017, 05:18 PM)jacketree link Wrote:Ah yes, the Crying Game.
Remember Dux getting uncomfortably close after returning a blocked FG for a TD.
Was this the game when turtling was coined?
If I had to guess, I'd say that the Fiesta Bowl vs. Oklahoma State was when that term started getting used.
"It's not what you don't know that gets you in trouble. It's what you think you know that just isn't so."
Mark Twain
(11-11-2017, 05:18 PM)jacketree link Wrote:Ah yes, the Crying Game.
Remember Dux getting uncomfortably close after returning a blocked FG for a TD.
Was this the game when turtling was coined?
If I had to guess, I'd say that the Fiesta Bowl vs. Oklahoma State was when that term started getting used.
"It's not what you don't know that gets you in trouble. It's what you think you know that just isn't so."
Mark Twain
11-11-2017, 06:06 PM
(11-11-2017, 05:18 PM)jacketree link Wrote:Ah yes, the Crying Game.
Remember Dux getting uncomfortably close after returning a blocked FG for a TD.
Was this the game when turtling was coined?
If I had to guess, I'd say that the Fiesta Bowl vs. Oklahoma State was when that term started getting used.
"It's not what you don't know that gets you in trouble. It's what you think you know that just isn't so."
Mark Twain
(11-11-2017, 05:18 PM)jacketree link Wrote:Ah yes, the Crying Game.
Remember Dux getting uncomfortably close after returning a blocked FG for a TD.
Was this the game when turtling was coined?
If I had to guess, I'd say that the Fiesta Bowl vs. Oklahoma State was when that term started getting used.
"It's not what you don't know that gets you in trouble. It's what you think you know that just isn't so."
Mark Twain
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »