10-25-2012, 01:37 PM
Let's just get this out of the way
10-25-2012, 01:37 PM
10-25-2012, 01:46 PM
Quote:For the freshmen classes that entered school from 2002-05, Cals football GSR was 48 percent and its FGR was 47 percent.
The GSR figure is the lowest in the Pac-12 lower than Arizona State (63%) lower than Washington State (53%) lower than all of em.
Thats worse than losing Big Game or missing the postseason. Much, much worse.
Wow, no pulling punches with that line.
Quote:For the freshmen classes that entered school from 2002-05, Cals football GSR was 48 percent and its FGR was 47 percent.
The GSR figure is the lowest in the Pac-12 lower than Arizona State (63%) lower than Washington State (53%) lower than all of em.
Thats worse than losing Big Game or missing the postseason. Much, much worse.
Wow, no pulling punches with that line.
10-25-2012, 01:46 PM
Quote:For the freshmen classes that entered school from 2002-05, Cals football GSR was 48 percent and its FGR was 47 percent.
The GSR figure is the lowest in the Pac-12 lower than Arizona State (63%) lower than Washington State (53%) lower than all of em.
Thats worse than losing Big Game or missing the postseason. Much, much worse.
Wow, no pulling punches with that line.
Quote:For the freshmen classes that entered school from 2002-05, Cals football GSR was 48 percent and its FGR was 47 percent.
The GSR figure is the lowest in the Pac-12 lower than Arizona State (63%) lower than Washington State (53%) lower than all of em.
Thats worse than losing Big Game or missing the postseason. Much, much worse.
Wow, no pulling punches with that line.
10-25-2012, 02:11 PM
Stanford not shy about promoting the academic achievements of its athletes. 22 Stanford athletics programs compiled graduation rates of 100 percent.
http://www.gostanford.com/genrel/102512aaf.html
http://www.gostanford.com/genrel/102512aaf.html
"We have an unwritten rule around here not to do anything stupid."
-Casey Jacobsen, Feb 3, 2000
Stanford not shy about promoting the academic achievements of its athletes. 22 Stanford athletics programs compiled graduation rates of 100 percent.
http://www.gostanford.com/genrel/102512aaf.html
http://www.gostanford.com/genrel/102512aaf.html
"We have an unwritten rule around here not to do anything stupid."
-Casey Jacobsen, Feb 3, 2000
10-25-2012, 02:11 PM
Stanford not shy about promoting the academic achievements of its athletes. 22 Stanford athletics programs compiled graduation rates of 100 percent.
http://www.gostanford.com/genrel/102512aaf.html
http://www.gostanford.com/genrel/102512aaf.html
"We have an unwritten rule around here not to do anything stupid."
-Casey Jacobsen, Feb 3, 2000
Stanford not shy about promoting the academic achievements of its athletes. 22 Stanford athletics programs compiled graduation rates of 100 percent.
http://www.gostanford.com/genrel/102512aaf.html
http://www.gostanford.com/genrel/102512aaf.html
"We have an unwritten rule around here not to do anything stupid."
-Casey Jacobsen, Feb 3, 2000
10-25-2012, 02:49 PM
(10-25-2012, 01:37 PM)OutsiderFan link Wrote:It just gets worse for the UC system's highest paid employee.
Is this enough to get him fired for "non-performance" or some other contract loophole...and avoid paying him for the next decade or whatever it is?
(10-25-2012, 01:37 PM)OutsiderFan link Wrote:It just gets worse for the UC system's highest paid employee.
Is this enough to get him fired for "non-performance" or some other contract loophole...and avoid paying him for the next decade or whatever it is?
10-25-2012, 02:49 PM
(10-25-2012, 01:37 PM)OutsiderFan link Wrote:It just gets worse for the UC system's highest paid employee.
Is this enough to get him fired for "non-performance" or some other contract loophole...and avoid paying him for the next decade or whatever it is?
(10-25-2012, 01:37 PM)OutsiderFan link Wrote:It just gets worse for the UC system's highest paid employee.
Is this enough to get him fired for "non-performance" or some other contract loophole...and avoid paying him for the next decade or whatever it is?
10-25-2012, 03:06 PM
From the article (emphasis mine):
Notice when Wilner wrote about Cal's academic success -- three years ago. Notice when the prior multi-year upward trajectory in Cal's academic numbers suddenly took a nosedive -- yep, soon after said article.
I hate to deny Tedford the full credit for such a complete failure but I'm filing this one under further evidence that if Wilner's on your side, it's time to buy extra insurance.
Quote:(Please note: I wrote a lengthy story three years ago about Cals academic success under Tedford.)
How does that compare to Cals past performance under Jeff Tedford? Here are the GSR/FGR figures for the previous four years and this year.
2007-08: 53/45
2008-09: 64/57
2009-10: 65/62
2010-11: 54/52
2011-12: 48/47
Notice when Wilner wrote about Cal's academic success -- three years ago. Notice when the prior multi-year upward trajectory in Cal's academic numbers suddenly took a nosedive -- yep, soon after said article.
I hate to deny Tedford the full credit for such a complete failure but I'm filing this one under further evidence that if Wilner's on your side, it's time to buy extra insurance.
From the article (emphasis mine):
Notice when Wilner wrote about Cal's academic success -- three years ago. Notice when the prior multi-year upward trajectory in Cal's academic numbers suddenly took a nosedive -- yep, soon after said article.
I hate to deny Tedford the full credit for such a complete failure but I'm filing this one under further evidence that if Wilner's on your side, it's time to buy extra insurance.
Quote:(Please note: I wrote a lengthy story three years ago about Cals academic success under Tedford.)
How does that compare to Cals past performance under Jeff Tedford? Here are the GSR/FGR figures for the previous four years and this year.
2007-08: 53/45
2008-09: 64/57
2009-10: 65/62
2010-11: 54/52
2011-12: 48/47
Notice when Wilner wrote about Cal's academic success -- three years ago. Notice when the prior multi-year upward trajectory in Cal's academic numbers suddenly took a nosedive -- yep, soon after said article.
I hate to deny Tedford the full credit for such a complete failure but I'm filing this one under further evidence that if Wilner's on your side, it's time to buy extra insurance.
10-25-2012, 03:06 PM
From the article (emphasis mine):
Notice when Wilner wrote about Cal's academic success -- three years ago. Notice when the prior multi-year upward trajectory in Cal's academic numbers suddenly took a nosedive -- yep, soon after said article.
I hate to deny Tedford the full credit for such a complete failure but I'm filing this one under further evidence that if Wilner's on your side, it's time to buy extra insurance.
Quote:(Please note: I wrote a lengthy story three years ago about Cals academic success under Tedford.)
How does that compare to Cals past performance under Jeff Tedford? Here are the GSR/FGR figures for the previous four years and this year.
2007-08: 53/45
2008-09: 64/57
2009-10: 65/62
2010-11: 54/52
2011-12: 48/47
Notice when Wilner wrote about Cal's academic success -- three years ago. Notice when the prior multi-year upward trajectory in Cal's academic numbers suddenly took a nosedive -- yep, soon after said article.
I hate to deny Tedford the full credit for such a complete failure but I'm filing this one under further evidence that if Wilner's on your side, it's time to buy extra insurance.
From the article (emphasis mine):
Notice when Wilner wrote about Cal's academic success -- three years ago. Notice when the prior multi-year upward trajectory in Cal's academic numbers suddenly took a nosedive -- yep, soon after said article.
I hate to deny Tedford the full credit for such a complete failure but I'm filing this one under further evidence that if Wilner's on your side, it's time to buy extra insurance.
Quote:(Please note: I wrote a lengthy story three years ago about Cals academic success under Tedford.)
How does that compare to Cals past performance under Jeff Tedford? Here are the GSR/FGR figures for the previous four years and this year.
2007-08: 53/45
2008-09: 64/57
2009-10: 65/62
2010-11: 54/52
2011-12: 48/47
Notice when Wilner wrote about Cal's academic success -- three years ago. Notice when the prior multi-year upward trajectory in Cal's academic numbers suddenly took a nosedive -- yep, soon after said article.
I hate to deny Tedford the full credit for such a complete failure but I'm filing this one under further evidence that if Wilner's on your side, it's time to buy extra insurance.
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »