09-30-2014, 03:21 PM
The umpteenth version of the "Will Shaw leave?" story produces a new detail: Shaw has something "tantamount to a lifetime deal": http://www.mercurynews.com/raiders/ci_26...aiders-job
Shaw with "lifetime deal"
The umpteenth version of the "Will Shaw leave?" story produces a new detail: Shaw has something "tantamount to a lifetime deal": http://www.mercurynews.com/raiders/ci_26...aiders-job
09-30-2014, 03:50 PM
I definitely heard that previously, I think after the Rose Bowl win. Maybe it was just speculation back then, but I'm quite certain it was being floated.
Apparently actual lifetime deals are illegal, but there's some kind of annual +1 clause.
Apparently actual lifetime deals are illegal, but there's some kind of annual +1 clause.
09-30-2014, 03:56 PM
(09-30-2014, 03:21 PM)washingtonismoney link Wrote:The umpteenth version of the "Will Shaw leave?" story produces a new detail: Shaw has something "tantamount to a lifetime deal": http://www.mercurynews.com/raiders/ci_26...aiders-job
Whose lifetime, his or mine? Hope it's at least mine :)
“Tact is the ability to tell someone to go to Hell in such a way that they look forward to the trip." W. Churchill
(09-30-2014, 03:21 PM)washingtonismoney link Wrote:The umpteenth version of the "Will Shaw leave?" story produces a new detail: Shaw has something "tantamount to a lifetime deal": http://www.mercurynews.com/raiders/ci_26...aiders-job
Whose lifetime, his or mine? Hope it's at least mine :)
“Tact is the ability to tell someone to go to Hell in such a way that they look forward to the trip." W. Churchill
09-30-2014, 04:05 PM
(09-30-2014, 03:50 PM)stupac2 link Wrote:I definitely heard that previously, I think after the Rose Bowl win. Maybe it was just speculation back then, but I'm quite certain it was being floated.
Apparently actual lifetime deals are illegal, but there's some kind of annual +1 clause.
Well, we knew he got an extension but knew little about the terms. (At least publicly.)
(09-30-2014, 03:50 PM)stupac2 link Wrote:I definitely heard that previously, I think after the Rose Bowl win. Maybe it was just speculation back then, but I'm quite certain it was being floated.
Apparently actual lifetime deals are illegal, but there's some kind of annual +1 clause.
Well, we knew he got an extension but knew little about the terms. (At least publicly.)
09-30-2014, 04:20 PM
(This post was last modified: 09-30-2014, 04:47 PM by thunder_chik.)
Shaw bought a really nice ocean view home in Rio del Mar for $4.5 million in March. Pix at http://www.latimes.com/business/realesta...story.html . I'm sure he wants to be close enough to enjoy it...
Pax et Bonum
(This post was last modified: 09-30-2014, 04:47 PM by thunder_chik.)
Shaw bought a really nice ocean view home in Rio del Mar for $4.5 million in March. Pix at http://www.latimes.com/business/realesta...story.html . I'm sure he wants to be close enough to enjoy it...
Pax et Bonum
09-30-2014, 04:48 PM
Certainly has rental potential, with enough square footage for family (Mom & Dad?) use.
Pax et Bonum
Certainly has rental potential, with enough square footage for family (Mom & Dad?) use.
Pax et Bonum
Redrum
Unregistered
Unregistered
10-01-2014, 09:40 AM
Believe me, a lifetime deal with Stanford is better than a lifetime deal with the Raiders. The Raiders' management would simply interpret the contract literally and announce the new Raiders coach right after Shaw's funeral.
Believe me, a lifetime deal with Stanford is better than a lifetime deal with the Raiders. The Raiders' management would simply interpret the contract literally and announce the new Raiders coach right after Shaw's funeral.
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »