10-05-2015, 12:11 PM
Wilner ranges from harsh-but-fair to trollish in his Stanford assessment: http://blogs.mercurynews.com/collegespor...e-week-64/
Because I feel like being grumpy, here's the objectionable part:
... If it was such a surprise, why did the spread get bet down from -17.5 to -10? I'm not saying you have to take the gambling public's views as gospel, but you should at least account for it.
Because I feel like being grumpy, here's the objectionable part:
Quote:Without quarterback Anu Solomon and Scooby Wright and others, Arizona was completely overmatched.
Anything closer than three or four touchdowns would have been a surprise.
... If it was such a surprise, why did the spread get bet down from -17.5 to -10? I'm not saying you have to take the gambling public's views as gospel, but you should at least account for it.