[Stanford_Cardinals]

How did Low APR U fail to cover that screen? As soon as the RB motioned out, jesus cover it.

This game is going how I expected before I started looking at those FEI stats. Low APR U just does not seem that good.

Cal's FEI results are pretty out-of-line w/ the rest of the computer rankings. I'd love to see a comparison of the predictive power of various computer rankings systems. A stats professor recently told me that he really likes the Massey-Peabody rankings--apparently they are designed to optimize out-of-sample predictive power. ESPN's PFI rankings use a similar approach to Massey-Peabody (and both have Kal at ~#25).

[Stanford_Cardinals]

How did Low APR U fail to cover that screen? As soon as the RB motioned out, jesus cover it.

This game is going how I expected before I started looking at those FEI stats. Low APR U just does not seem that good.

Cal's FEI results are pretty out-of-line w/ the rest of the computer rankings. I'd love to see a comparison of the predictive power of various computer rankings systems. A stats professor recently told me that he really likes the Massey-Peabody rankings--apparently they are designed to optimize out-of-sample predictive power. ESPN's PFI rankings use a similar approach to Massey-Peabody (and both have Kal at ~#25).