[BostonCard]

UCLA is favored by 4, but I expect Low APR U to win.  They have been good this year sacking the quarterback and gaining interceptions and are going up against an injured offensive line and a freshman quarterback who is prone to mistakes.  On defense, UCLA is "fragile".  Without Lasco, Low APR U's running game isn't as strong as it was, but they should still be able to run against UCLA's poor front 7.  And while UCLA's DB's are a bit better, Goff should be able to pick them apart.  I'm thinking a 40's - 30's type of game here.  But we will see how far UCLA has fallen, or if Low APR U is just overrated.

That ought to teach me to have any faith in the Bears.  Man, was that a spectacular fail by Cal, which I guess is redundant.

BC

[BostonCard]

UCLA is favored by 4, but I expect Low APR U to win.  They have been good this year sacking the quarterback and gaining interceptions and are going up against an injured offensive line and a freshman quarterback who is prone to mistakes.  On defense, UCLA is "fragile".  Without Lasco, Low APR U's running game isn't as strong as it was, but they should still be able to run against UCLA's poor front 7.  And while UCLA's DB's are a bit better, Goff should be able to pick them apart.  I'm thinking a 40's - 30's type of game here.  But we will see how far UCLA has fallen, or if Low APR U is just overrated.

That ought to teach me to have any faith in the Bears.  Man, was that a spectacular fail by Cal, which I guess is redundant.

BC