10-24-2015, 09:50 AM
I read the headline as outside income total.
Don't see the big deal. USC is private, as are the businesses & nonprofits where he's a board member. USC's problems go deeper than simply saying the AD is spread too thin. As far as I'm concerned, that's a good thing for Stanford.
Don't see the big deal. USC is private, as are the businesses & nonprofits where he's a board member. USC's problems go deeper than simply saying the AD is spread too thin. As far as I'm concerned, that's a good thing for Stanford.
"To the press alone, checkered as it is with abuses, the world is indebted for all the triumphs which have been gained by reason and humanity over error and oppression." ~ James Madison