11-09-2015, 07:04 AM
Just saw Danny Kannell making his cases for the rankings. He said he values undefeated teams while ranking during the season, but he is totally OK with re-ranking them after the whole season has been played.Â
My preference is to rank them based on what they have done to date, not what they might do later. We'll see what the committee believes tomorrow night, because how far can they move Oklahoma State from #14 in one week? Because let's not forget, TCU didn't have any good wins that justified them bing ranked as high as they were either.
And BTW, look at UNC. They could possibly beat Clemson in the ACC CG, the way they are playing.
My preference is to rank them based on what they have done to date, not what they might do later. We'll see what the committee believes tomorrow night, because how far can they move Oklahoma State from #14 in one week? Because let's not forget, TCU didn't have any good wins that justified them bing ranked as high as they were either.
And BTW, look at UNC. They could possibly beat Clemson in the ACC CG, the way they are playing.