Wide receivers....the good and not so good

Hello There, Guest! Welcome to The CardBoard!

Feel free to Register and discuss on various topics with likeminded people. Already have an account? Please Login!

Thread Rating:

0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
1
2
3
4
5

Wide receivers....the good and not so good

Redrum
Unregistered

#11

08-17-2011, 03:40 PM

I've watched enough teams that depended on (basically) ONE running back:Â South Carolina w/ Marcus LattimoreÂ or Oregon State w/Â Jacquizz RodgersÂ orÂ Arkansas w/ Knile Davis.Â Â

By those standards,Â Stanford is "running back by committee"Â No argument that Taylor got most of the carries,Â but lots of other guys did, too.

#11

Redrum

08-17-2011, 03:40 PM

I've watched enough teams that depended on (basically) ONE running back:Â South Carolina w/ Marcus LattimoreÂ or Oregon State w/Â Jacquizz RodgersÂ orÂ Arkansas w/ Knile Davis.Â Â

By those standards,Â Stanford is "running back by committee"Â No argument that Taylor got most of the carries,Â but lots of other guys did, too.

Reply

« Next Oldest | Next Newest »

Messages In This Thread

Wide receivers....the good and not so good - by Redrum - 08-17-2011, 08:33 AM

Re: Wide receivers....the good and not so good - by washingtonismoney - 08-17-2011, 09:14 AM

Re: Wide receivers....the good and not so good - by yvonne - 08-17-2011, 11:30 AM

Re: Wide receivers....the good and not so good - by fullmetal - 08-17-2011, 11:41 AM

Yup. Running Back By Committee - by Redrum - 08-17-2011, 11:59 AM

Re: Wide receivers....the good and not so good - by terry - 08-17-2011, 12:30 PM

Re: Wide receivers....the good and not so good - by fullmetal - 08-17-2011, 01:03 PM

Re: Wide receivers....the good and not so good - by washingtonismoney - 08-17-2011, 02:00 PM

Re: Wide receivers....the good and not so good - by terry - 08-17-2011, 03:19 PM

Quibbling over a definition of "by committee" - by Redrum - 08-17-2011, 03:40 PM

Re: Wide receivers....the good and not so good - by fullmetal - 08-17-2011, 04:24 PM

Re: Wide receivers....the good and not so good - by JohnR34231 - 08-19-2011, 02:22 AM

Re: Wide receivers....the good and not so good - by cardfan09 - 08-19-2011, 09:26 AM

Re: Wide receivers....the good and not so good - by fullmetal - 08-19-2011, 10:11 AM

Re: Wide receivers....the good and not so good - by JohnR34231 - 08-19-2011, 10:23 AM

Only ONE test - by Redrum - 08-19-2011, 12:44 PM

Re: Only ONE test - by Griffins78 - 08-19-2011, 01:23 PM

Re: Wide receivers....the good and not so good - by JohnR34231 - 08-19-2011, 03:14 PM

Re: Wide receivers....the good and not so good - by Griffins78 - 08-19-2011, 05:08 PM

Re: Wide receivers....the good and not so good - by washingtonismoney - 08-17-2011, 09:21 AM

View a Printable Version