08-19-2011, 10:23 AM
I think most prospects at least give lip service to academics (it's only when they don't that it's significant). Some mean it; some don't. I do agree that if Watkins' parents are MIT grads he probably means it.
Wide receivers....the good and not so good
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
Messages In This Thread
Wide receivers....the good and not so good - by Redrum - 08-17-2011, 08:33 AM
Re: Wide receivers....the good and not so good - by washingtonismoney - 08-17-2011, 09:14 AM
Re: Wide receivers....the good and not so good - by yvonne - 08-17-2011, 11:30 AM
Re: Wide receivers....the good and not so good - by fullmetal - 08-17-2011, 11:41 AM
Yup. Running Back By Committee - by Redrum - 08-17-2011, 11:59 AM
Re: Wide receivers....the good and not so good - by terry - 08-17-2011, 12:30 PM
Re: Wide receivers....the good and not so good - by fullmetal - 08-17-2011, 01:03 PM
Re: Wide receivers....the good and not so good - by washingtonismoney - 08-17-2011, 02:00 PM
Re: Wide receivers....the good and not so good - by terry - 08-17-2011, 03:19 PM
Quibbling over a definition of "by committee" - by Redrum - 08-17-2011, 03:40 PM
Re: Wide receivers....the good and not so good - by fullmetal - 08-17-2011, 04:24 PM
Re: Wide receivers....the good and not so good - by JohnR34231 - 08-19-2011, 02:22 AM
Re: Wide receivers....the good and not so good - by cardfan09 - 08-19-2011, 09:26 AM
Re: Wide receivers....the good and not so good - by fullmetal - 08-19-2011, 10:11 AM
Re: Wide receivers....the good and not so good - by JohnR34231 - 08-19-2011, 10:23 AM
Only ONE test - by Redrum - 08-19-2011, 12:44 PM
Re: Only ONE test - by Griffins78 - 08-19-2011, 01:23 PM
Re: Wide receivers....the good and not so good - by JohnR34231 - 08-19-2011, 03:14 PM
Re: Wide receivers....the good and not so good - by Griffins78 - 08-19-2011, 05:08 PM
Re: Wide receivers....the good and not so good - by washingtonismoney - 08-17-2011, 09:21 AM