02-03-2016, 04:08 PM
(02-02-2016, 05:32 PM)garvin link Wrote:I think you misread winflop, Papa John. He wasn't criticizing the graduation rate, but the time it takes to achieve. And the numbers you cite are based on a six-year cohort, not four.
The numbers include both six- and four-year cohorts. The graphs are a bit hard to read, but the UC-system six-year graduation rate has remained pretty constant over the past 15 years--in the 80% range--while the four-year grad rate has improved a lot--from the mid-40% to low-60%. (If you are a California taxpayer, you should care.)
Berkeley's 4-year grad rate is just below 80%, which is much better than the other UCs and the typical public AAU member. And UCLA is looking good at a bit above 70%.
I was talking recently with someone who graduated from Berkeley in the mid-1990s. She was talking about how tough it was to get through C.al in four years, and just assumed it was the same story today. For a variety of reasons, all of the UC campuses--including the Santa Barbara campus where I work--have worked hard since 2000 to improve the retention and grad rates.
If there's one thing people have learned in Berkeley, it's that you can't put "Cal football" and "Rose Bowl" in the same sentence. The words just don't fit. You'd be better off linking "covered wagons" with "Mars travel." (Bruce Jenkins, Cal '70, SF Chronicle, Nov. 11, 2017)
