In this case, I like the idea of conceding because Kirsten is playing so badly she seemed a likely loss no matter where we stuck her. That's leaves our 1, 2, 3, and 4 to play their 2, 3. 4. and 5.Â
The other reason for doing it is that we have no clear 1,2,3, or 4 right now. Stackhouse has proven, regardless of how she is swinging, to have the guts to win at #1, Kim has the solidest game overall, and Danielson has been our star in this event so far.
And in match play, things can happen. What has killed Kirsten is horrid holes: three doubles and a triple. But while a horrid hole costs your two or three strokes in stroke play, it only counts once against you in match play. As a very good example, I once tied our state champ in match play. I'd measure my odds of doing that in stroke play as roughly to my chances, four years later, of starting at corner back for Stanford.
The other reason for doing it is that we have no clear 1,2,3, or 4 right now. Stackhouse has proven, regardless of how she is swinging, to have the guts to win at #1, Kim has the solidest game overall, and Danielson has been our star in this event so far.
And in match play, things can happen. What has killed Kirsten is horrid holes: three doubles and a triple. But while a horrid hole costs your two or three strokes in stroke play, it only counts once against you in match play. As a very good example, I once tied our state champ in match play. I'd measure my odds of doing that in stroke play as roughly to my chances, four years later, of starting at corner back for Stanford.
