06-15-2010, 07:43 AM
I am in odd territory here and disagree with Garvin and agree with the Big V.
I think the TV revenue for the schools in the conference will be LESS than it would have been without CO and UT. We have to split revenue with them and that\'s a drain and in the TV markets they bring, we are already have exposure so it is a net loss. As V points out, travel expenses etc. will also rise.
I think the presidents will know that they got less than they could have...any comparison with the Big X or other conference will tell them that.
Like CO, I think the sun has set on UT football and expect them to descend to the mediocrity that is CO. Besides those unis are gawdawful.
Scott has done enough damage and so mismanaged it (wouldn\'t you get TX signed up first?) that he should go back to women\'s tennis...it\'s love - 40 time.
I think the TV revenue for the schools in the conference will be LESS than it would have been without CO and UT. We have to split revenue with them and that\'s a drain and in the TV markets they bring, we are already have exposure so it is a net loss. As V points out, travel expenses etc. will also rise.
I think the presidents will know that they got less than they could have...any comparison with the Big X or other conference will tell them that.
Like CO, I think the sun has set on UT football and expect them to descend to the mediocrity that is CO. Besides those unis are gawdawful.
Scott has done enough damage and so mismanaged it (wouldn\'t you get TX signed up first?) that he should go back to women\'s tennis...it\'s love - 40 time.