[BostonCard]

But not on Yahoo fantasy football: http://sports.yahoo.com/news/why-ty-mont...22018.html

I liked this take-away...

My biggest Montgomery takeaway is this: he should be in your lineup! And it’s also why I like using three WRs and a flex as a standard setup — more players, less flukes, more fun, more players to root for.

Since I don't play fantasy football, I had a question.  Aside from the fact that your starting lineup has to have a certain number of players at various positions, is there a functional difference in having TM at wide receiver versus RB?  Are the point allocations for the various stats different?

BC

[BostonCard]

But not on Yahoo fantasy football: http://sports.yahoo.com/news/why-ty-mont...22018.html

I liked this take-away...

My biggest Montgomery takeaway is this: he should be in your lineup! And it’s also why I like using three WRs and a flex as a standard setup — more players, less flukes, more fun, more players to root for.

Since I don't play fantasy football, I had a question.  Aside from the fact that your starting lineup has to have a certain number of players at various positions, is there a functional difference in having TM at wide receiver versus RB?  Are the point allocations for the various stats different?

BC