11-20-2016, 09:30 PM
(11-20-2016, 04:38 PM)Boston Card link Wrote:I believe the complaint centers around the lack of PAC-12 nets on DirectTV, thereby forcing the OP to use a not-quite-legal alternative.Literally stealing from Stanford as the Stanford AD is a co-owner and profit sharing member of the Pac-12 Nets. I recall all of those Hollywood and music stars that used to talk about various sharing sites impacting the entertainment industry in those promo spots. Here the not-quite legal alternatives impact the Pac-12 and the Stanford AD. I understand the desire to watch, but it is a touch ironic that a "fan" site has a discussion on how to damage the entity we claim to support.
BC

