12-04-2016, 08:13 AM
(12-04-2016, 07:00 AM)Mick link Wrote:It would set a bad precedent. UW has a bad OOC schedule, #127 in the country.But UW only played 3 OOC games because the Pac-12 has 9 conference games. Against a few other conferences that 9th game should be compared against their best OOC. Then UW scheduled a Power5 conference team. Ironically, from the same conference with all of these teams now getting credit for playing in that conference. Idaho is a local thing, lots of teams have that type of deal.
http://www.inquisitr.com/3765640/college...n-whos-in/
Leaves one game. If that one OOC game is a real disqualifier then what were all of those SEC teams doing to get into the BCS and now CFP? Oh, that's right they branded themselves "The Nation's Best Conference" so no need to worry about the 4 OOC cupcakes they were often playing AT HOME.
The bias against the AfterBedtime conference is getting tired. At every turn the Pac-12, or its players, have whatever attributes are not important and have flaws in whatever is the attribute of the year. Often the narrative will change the very next year. See: Andrew Luck, Pac-12 BCS CG invitations, Pac-12 BCS at-large invitations, Pac-12 CFP considerations.
Gets to be a bit much. I have full faith that UW is in.
Real questions for me are down the list. Colorado or USC in the Rose? Pac-12 should have at least 2 in NY6. That would be OK. Three would be better. And if the Pac-12 had the same level of love as the BigTen or SEC it would be three this year. So we shall see.

