[Mick]

[quote author=CornFed link=topic=16303.msg183644#msg183644 date=1482736079]

But Goose, I am 100% convinced that he is NOT selflessly stepping aside to give his peers more reps.  That is delusional.

I don't see Goose making this claim anywhere in his post; he merely stated that the damage of McCaffrey not playing was minimal. Other players getting reps is a byproduct of his decision but nowhere did Goose list this as a motive.
[/quote]


I don't think we've seen the extent of the damage yet.  If Christian is taken in the Top Ten and Stanford rolls 49-7 over NC, and there's some sort of public rapprochement, and there's no public condemnation, then we can say the damage is minimal.  Until then, let's just wait.

[Mick]

[quote author=CornFed link=topic=16303.msg183644#msg183644 date=1482736079]

But Goose, I am 100% convinced that he is NOT selflessly stepping aside to give his peers more reps.  That is delusional.

I don't see Goose making this claim anywhere in his post; he merely stated that the damage of McCaffrey not playing was minimal. Other players getting reps is a byproduct of his decision but nowhere did Goose list this as a motive.
[/quote]


I don't think we've seen the extent of the damage yet.  If Christian is taken in the Top Ten and Stanford rolls 49-7 over NC, and there's some sort of public rapprochement, and there's no public condemnation, then we can say the damage is minimal.  Until then, let's just wait.