[Mick]

[quote author=teejers1 link=topic=16408.msg185674#msg185674 date=1483997580]
Put me in group that thinks:

ןɐɔ could do a LOT better than hiring Chip Kelly

Wow, a LOT better than a coach with a record of 46-7 (33-3 in conference), twice national coach of the year in a span of four years. Worst season was his first (10-3, final ranking was #11), finished in the top four nationally every year thereafter. ןɐɔ must be a much more desirable job than I thought if they can recruit someone who is a LOT better.
[/quote]

This is what I meant when I said the NFL stink will hang on Chip Kelly.  He was a ridiculously strong coach for Oregon, but we have multiple people on this site saying, "Yeah, Cal could do a lot better" because he walked into a no-win situation with horrendous people like Jed York and Trent Baalke and a roster bereft of talent, with no strong position coaches or OC's wanting to join him.  Total recency bias.

[Mick]

[quote author=teejers1 link=topic=16408.msg185674#msg185674 date=1483997580]
Put me in group that thinks:

ןɐɔ could do a LOT better than hiring Chip Kelly

Wow, a LOT better than a coach with a record of 46-7 (33-3 in conference), twice national coach of the year in a span of four years. Worst season was his first (10-3, final ranking was #11), finished in the top four nationally every year thereafter. ןɐɔ must be a much more desirable job than I thought if they can recruit someone who is a LOT better.
[/quote]

This is what I meant when I said the NFL stink will hang on Chip Kelly.  He was a ridiculously strong coach for Oregon, but we have multiple people on this site saying, "Yeah, Cal could do a lot better" because he walked into a no-win situation with horrendous people like Jed York and Trent Baalke and a roster bereft of talent, with no strong position coaches or OC's wanting to join him.  Total recency bias.