09-25-2017, 11:15 AM
There's a pretty big variation in the way computers assess Stanford:
ESPN's FPI: #9 (and the best! team in the Pac-12!)
Sagarin: #18
Bill Connelly's S&P+: #16 (#32 if preseason projections are filtered out)
Ed Feng's The Power Rank: #13
'
Ok, maybe less variation than I thought when I began the post. But still somewhat interesting.
ESPN's FPI: #9 (and the best! team in the Pac-12!)
Sagarin: #18
Bill Connelly's S&P+: #16 (#32 if preseason projections are filtered out)
Ed Feng's The Power Rank: #13
'
Ok, maybe less variation than I thought when I began the post. But still somewhat interesting.
